• Latest
  • All
Why pro-abortion arguments never will be valid

Why pro-abortion arguments never will be valid

May 14, 2022
South Dakota House passes bill banning “gender reassignment surgeries” for minors

South Dakota House passes bill banning “gender reassignment surgeries” for minors

February 4, 2023
Sixth booster shot in Canada: Jordan Peterson refuses

Sixth booster shot in Canada: Jordan Peterson refuses

February 4, 2023
George Orwell’s “double think” alive and well in Massachusetts

George Orwell’s “double think” alive and well in Massachusetts

February 4, 2023
Russian pro-family news in January 2023

Russian pro-family news in January 2023

February 3, 2023
The world needs manly men: I vindicate virility!

The world needs manly men: I vindicate virility!

February 3, 2023

Abortion in Colombia: No need for parental consent for children under 14

February 2, 2023
World Youth Day and the SDGs

World Youth Day and the SDGs

February 2, 2023
Beware, citizens of the EU: You might be eating insects!

Beware, citizens of the EU: You might be eating insects!

February 1, 2023
The icon of the Mother of God the Milk-Giver

The icon of the Mother of God the Milk-Giver

February 1, 2023
Ten goals of the globalist agenda

Ten goals of the globalist agenda

February 1, 2023
  • About iFamNews
  • Contact

Navigation Button Subscribe

  • Subscribe
February 5, 2023
  • Login
  • Register
No Result
View All Result
  • English
    • Italiano
    • Español
    • Français
    • Deutsch
    • Polski
    • српски
    • Русский

Navigation Button Donate

  • Donate
International Family News Network (IFN)
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
International Family News Network (IFN)
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
No Result
View All Result
International Family News Network (IFN)
No Result
View All Result

Why pro-abortion arguments never will be valid

Cato by Cato
May 14, 2022
in Foreground, Life
588
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0
Why pro-abortion arguments never will be valid
Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on TelegramShare on TwitterShare on WeChat

Last updated on May 16th, 2022 at 11:16 am

In article entitled “The end of Roe v. Wade hurts you, too, even if you don’t plan to march,” published by Fox News (!) on May 9, 2022, leftists author Rachel Carmona decries the potential overturning of the 1973 Supreme Court decision that elevated abortion to a Constitutional right. In regard to the recently leaked draft Supreme Court decision that would overturn Roe, Carmona writes:

“Here’s the problem: What’s about to happen in this country isn’t just an assault on the vocal minority of women who’ve been taking to the streets, to state capitals, to the Capitol to demand that our voices are heard, that our rights aren’t trampled on, that our bodies stay ours. It’s an assault on the silent majority of this country, too. On the women — and men — who haven’t chanted, marched, or protested. Who haven’t taken to the streets or shown up to halls of power. Who still, nonetheless, want abortion to be safe, accessible, and legal.”

Carmona then claims that a “silent majority” of 80% of Americans want abortion to be legal:

“It’s a whopping 80% of all Americans, a supermajority. Some of us identify as pro-choice; others don’t. Some of us are Democrats; some are Republicans; and others still are apolitical. Some of us get lifesaving health care from Planned Parenthood; others have protested outside its doors. Some of us believe abortion is fundamental, an extension of our right to privacy and bodily autonomy… It makes sense, then, that while eighty percent of this country agrees on almost nothing — even and especially regarding abortion — there is one big exception: When the time comes to make this deeply personal choice, 80% of this country believes that you and your doctor should have the right to make it together, without the government holding you back.”

She then argues that should the draft opinion become final, no one will be safe:

“[T]his ruling doesn’t just go after Democrats, or the pro-choice movement, or the feminists the far right has always looked down upon, or the activists they’ve never cared for. It goes after everyone. It has the potential to criminalize everyone. Not just the vocal minority in the streets in deep blue states and cities, but the silent majority sitting around their kitchen tables in small conservative towns like the one I call home in Texas, grateful for the abortion their wife was able to access during a pregnancy that put her health at risk, or afraid of the one their granddaughter might no longer be able to access if she were raped.”

Carmona concludes that she and her radical activist friends will keep on “chanting, marching and protesting. We’ll keep donating and voting until the attacks on our rights and our bodily autonomy end.” Who are they doing this for? “[W]e’re not just doing it for us. We’re doing it for you — for the silent majority — too. “

Despite all that Carmona argues, despite her citing the dubious claim that 80% of Americans support abortion, in the end her argument should hold no sway. Why? Because a baby developing in his mother’s womb is a human.

Let’s look at two incontrovertible scientific facts. First, the child developing in his mother’s womb has a unique human genetic code that is different from his mother’s (and father’s). Just like all humans, the child has 46 chromosomes, with twenty-three chromosomes coming from each of his parents. Second, assuming no anomalies, at any stage of a pregnancy a child is at the proper stage of development for a human. For example, at six weeks of age a child in the womb is at the same stage of development as you and I were at six weeks old. Were we not human then? These two facts strongly show that a child developing in his mother’s womb is just as human as you and I.

It must also be noted that the arguments used to support abortion—the mother is too poor, the mother is too young, the mother already has too many children, having a child would be too much of a burden for the mother, the mother is not ready to have a child, there is no father in the picture, etc.—can be used to support the killing of children already born. Indeed, each of these arguments that applied pre-birth would most likely also apply post-birth. Do we really want to allow people to be able to kill their already-born children? This is where allowing abortion leads to and some of those on the left actually support this position.

Thus, whether 80% of the people believe that abortion should be legal is irrelevant. A child in the womb is just as much human as you and I and murdering an innocent human is always wrong. No poll number can change that fact. And if we fail to stop people from murdering a child in the womb, we will have a hard time arguing that a child already born cannot also be murdered. So keep protesting and marching Rachel Carmona. Both science and reason will always show that you are wrong. Let’s pray that the Supreme Court remains steadfast and supports life when it issues its final opinion in a few months.

Tags: Abortionabortion legislationinfanticidePro-lifeprolifeRachel Carmonaright to lifeRoe v. Wade
Cato

Cato

Cato is a staunch defender of Western Civilization and the Judeo-Christian worldview. He will end all of his articles: "And the radical LGBT agenda must be defeated" as this is the pre-eminent battle of our day.

Discussion about this post

Popular News

  • Trans travesty at the European Figure Skating Championships

    Trans travesty at the European Figure Skating Championships

    6 shares 2.1k VIEWS
    Share 6 Tweet 0
  • Beware, citizens of the EU: You might be eating insects!

    31 shares 1.6k VIEWS
    Share 31 Tweet 0
  • Demonic statues erected in New York City

    1 shares 1.3k VIEWS
    Share 1 Tweet 0
  • Thought police in the UK: British man fined for silently praying for his deceased son

    8 shares 1.2k VIEWS
    Share 8 Tweet 0
  • British government vetoes Scottish parliament for the first time over transgender bill

    32 shares 1.1k VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 32

Twitter iFamNewsEN

Tweets by @iFamNewsEN
IFN – International Family News Network

© 2022 IFN – International Family News - All Rights Reserved.

Quick Links

  • About iFamNews
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate

  • en English
  • it Italiano
  • es Español
  • fr Français
  • de Deutsch
  • pl Polski
  • sr српски
  • ru Русский
  • Login
  • Sign Up

© 2022 IFN – International Family News - All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Subscribe