George Abaraonye, the president-elect of the Oxford Union debating society, is facing widespread condemnation after celebrating the assassination of Charlie Kirk. In group chat messages on WhatsApp, Abaraonye reportedly said, “Charlie Kirk got shot, let’s f—ing go,” and “loool,” using a laughing emoji to express approval over Kirk’s death. These comments surfaced shortly after Kirk was fatally shot at a speaking event.
The Oxford Union’s current leadership issued a statement condemning Abaraonye’s reported comments, stating his views do not represent the society’s leadership or the committee led by current president Moosa Harraj. They stressed they stand by free speech and respectful debate, while firmly opposing political violence.
Reaction came quickly from alumni, commentators, and public figures. British columnist David Vance said that condemning the comments is not enough and the Union must consider removing Abaraonye from his upcoming role. Former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss called on university leadership to expel him, saying his conduct brings shame upon Oxford and Britain.
Abaraonye had previously debated Charlie Kirk at an Oxford Union event in May on the subject of “toxic masculinity.” That encounter, already tense, now gains new scrutiny in light of these recent remarks. His posted reactions deepen concerns about the culture within the Union and confirm the belief that these leftist students are unable to preside over an institution famed for civil discourse.
Amid the controversy, many are calling this moment a test of free speech limits. While organizations may protect robust debate, celebrating violence against someone—even rhetorically—represents more than opinion: it challenges basic standards of decency. Responses like Oxford Union’s statement are important, but accountability, especially for leaders, is essential in preserving trust in institutions meant to model respectful exchange.
Discussion about this post