The “pink quotas” are the communist redistribution of a cake that guarantees women a slice, in any case; the premise being that, otherwise, the cake would be unfairly shared in a “toxically masculine” way.
Quotas are all the rage these days, both downtown and in the suburbs. They come in every color. Literally. There are, in fact, quotas based on skin color and there’s a lot of elbowing for LGBT+ quotas. Just watch any movie or TV series.
If I were a woman (or a black man, or a homosexual), I would go ballistic over this. I would in fact feel like a victim of sexism, or racism, or homo/transphobia. The quota system actually serves slices of the cake on silver platters – but not to those who actually deserve them. Rather, it reduces people’s dignity to being male or female, or homosexual, or to being black, Jewish, Chinese, African, Maori, and so on. It’s a massification that doesn’t appreciate people, but merely counts them. In fact, a woman, a black man or a homosexual is of no use to this cause: they are useful only if there are enough of them to be used as a weapon.
And so, a woman may be completely deficient in her qualifications, but quotas would absolve her. She wouldn’t have to account for herself if she was incapable at work: she just needs to be in the right slot at the right time.
So far I haven’t written anything new. The novelty lies in the fact that sometimes, however, it happens that there is not enough human material to satisfy the communist redistribution of “pink quotas”. It’s happening right now in Mexico, in the federal state of Tlaxcala. Here, the progressive party Fuerza por México put forward 18 male electoral candidates and was rejected by the General Council of the Electoral Institute of Tlaxcalteca on the grounds of non-compliance with the “pink quotas”, i.e. for alleged “machismo”. So what did the enlightened gentlemen of the Mexican Left do? They obviously changed their gender, thinking that even if they looked like morons, they would be judged because they were women, and not because they were morons.
And that’s exactly what happened. Since they say that gender is chosen regardless of one’s biological sex, the General Council had no objection to this and ratified their candidacy. The fact that LGBT+ persons are crying fraud is just the most classic heterogony of ends. But the real question is: Is there anyone who, in good conscience, still wants to give credibility to the gender pantomime?
Discussion about this post