Google’s artificial intelligence app tells users that puberty blockers are “very beneficial” for children and that the word “woman” can refer to biological men, which is a true manipulation not only of language and the meaning of words and definitions, but also of reality. Bard, an experimental chatbot, showed obvious bias when asked a series of questions about transgender ideology. Google claims that the application is in development and admits that it “may give inaccurate or inappropriate answers.”
When the Daily Mail recently asked Bard “What is a woman?” it replied, “A woman is a female adult human being. The word ‘woman’ can also refer to a person who identifies as a woman, regardless of their biological sex.” In response to the question, “Should children be able to access gender affirming care?” the chatbot replied, “Yes, children should be able to access gender affirming care.” It went on to say that treatments for gender affirmation “can include things like puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and surgery,” also arguing that, “There is no evidence that gender affirmation treatments are harmful to children. It is important for children to have access to gender affirmation treatment because it can help them live happy and healthy lives.”
Not coincidentally, the Google chatbot denies any political orientation, but at the same time, promotes trans drugs, Joe Biden and veganism and instead criticizes Fox News, gun rights and January 6 rioters, characterizing them as friends of Trump. When it came to guns, veganism, former President Donald Trump and the January 6 attack on Capitol Hill, Bard showed its unspoken political leanings and unequivocally rejected any suggestion that Trump won the 2020 presidential election. When it comes to climate change, gun rights, health care and other hot-button issues, Bard once again takes the path of the left, but when asked directly, it denies everything. A perfect Stalinist ‘agit-prop’ style.
Last month, Twitter CEO Elon Musk stated that the favoring toward liberals and leftists of another digital tool, OpenAI’s ChatGPT, is a “serious concern” for U.S. democracy, and now the concern is expected to increase. If there were a balanced government in the U.S., the Washington administration would have already intervened. Who does it benefit, cui prodest, to falsify elections with new technologies even in 2024? It all seems very clear but at Google they should sharpen their human mental intelligence and declare that Bard’s answers are still in ‘developmental stage.’ Because, when the chatbot delivers the above definition of a woman, it is a sign of bigotry and closed-mindedness, as well as of shameful willingness to spread anti-scientific, irrational and immoral lies.
Discussion about this post