• Latest
  • All
Doubleplus Unscientific: American Cancer Society Adopts Newspeak

Doubleplus Unscientific: American Cancer Society Adopts Newspeak

August 6, 2020
The icon of the Mother of God the Milk-Giver

The icon of the Mother of God the Milk-Giver

February 1, 2023
Ten goals of the globalist agenda

Ten goals of the globalist agenda

February 1, 2023
Trans travesty at the European Figure Skating Championships

Trans travesty at the European Figure Skating Championships

January 31, 2023
Catholic priest convicted after shutting down abortion clinic

Catholic priest convicted after shutting down abortion clinic

January 31, 2023
The Siren Song of “Equality”

UN sounds the alarm: Global population is aging

January 31, 2023
Some thoughts on the breakdown of Western Civilization                             

Some thoughts on the breakdown of Western Civilization                             

January 31, 2023
IOF’s joint statement for the 2022 Commission on the Status of Women

IOF, joined by organizations worldwide, urges UN commission to honor promise to protect family rights and religious values

January 30, 2023

A dangerous initiative at Italian schools

January 30, 2023
Demonic statues erected in New York City

Demonic statues erected in New York City

January 29, 2023
Can we just watch sports, please?

Can we just watch sports, please?

January 28, 2023
  • About iFamNews
  • Contact

Navigation Button Subscribe

  • Subscribe
February 1, 2023
  • Login
  • Register
No Result
View All Result
  • English
    • Italiano
    • Español
    • Français
    • Deutsch
    • Polski
    • српски
    • Русский

Navigation Button Donate

  • Donate
International Family News Network (IFN)
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
International Family News Network (IFN)
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
No Result
View All Result
International Family News Network (IFN)
No Result
View All Result

Doubleplus Unscientific: American Cancer Society Adopts Newspeak

The fact is it is a disservice to women (to say nothing of demeaning and insulting) to refer to them as "individuals with a cervix."

Joseph Grabowski by Joseph Grabowski
August 6, 2020
in Breaking News, Opinion, Science
567
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Doubleplus Unscientific: American Cancer Society Adopts Newspeak
Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on TelegramShare on TwitterShare on WeChat

A friend sent me a link to a Tweet recently from CNN in a text message. Noting the source, I braced myself for what might be revealed upon clicking, knowing that this friend would only thus send something with no commentary or preamble because the content was surprising or strange. Well, the Tweet did not disappoint in this regard. Here it is, in all its glorious absurdity:

Individuals with a cervix are now recommended to start cervical cancers screening at 25 and continue through age 65, with HPV testing every five years as the preferred method of testing, according to a new guideline released by the American Cancer Society https://t.co/gUhYdIIx69

— CNN (@CNN) July 30, 2020
CNN Tweet referring to women as “individuals with a cervix.”

Clicking through, the story being reported was relatively straightforward and simple: the American Cancer Society has updated its guidance on human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as a means of cervical cancer screening, raising the age at which regular testing is recommended to begin from 21 to 25. I don’t think there’s anything very shocking or disturbing about this: if possibly there is, I would have to plead ignorance upon the question and leave it to gynecologists and oncologists to explain. Nonetheless, the story was shocking: because exploring some of the links, I realized that the “individuals with a cervix” language was not just some nonsensical politically-correct drivel adopted by a CNN reporter: it was taken from the American Cancer Society’s own journal article.

The paper is free online. Blandly titled, “Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society,” it does not ostensibly present as matter for great controversy or debate, much less as a place where ideology might be served up alongside science. And yet, there it is, right in the first line of the paper’s abstract: “The American Cancer Society (ACS) recommends that individuals with a cervix initiate cervical cancer screening at age 25 years.”

Of course, it would be pointless for someone who doesn’t have a cervix to undergo regular cervical cancer screenings; but we used to just call such people “women.” The ACS here is adopting the “Newspeak” of gender ideology and LGBT extremists, trying to be “inclusive” of “trans-men”—i.e., biological females who have “transitioned” to become male but still have cervices and are therefore susceptible to cervical cancer.

Is there really any harm in this, though? Or have these Hippocratic oath-takers become hypocrites in regard to that first principle of doing no harm? I think the second. First of all, anything that further cements and normalizes radical gender ideology and encourages more people (especially young people) to pursue the dangerous path of “transition” is problematic on its face. Secondly, though, traditionally cancer awareness campaigns have always been about being as straightforward and clear as possible, even sometimes to the point of being crass. One can think of examples from breast cancer awareness campaigns, for example, which were far from euphemistic to say the least! But what woman walks around so aware of her being “an individual with a cervix” that such language is as likely to catch her eye as, say, a headline proclaiming: “WOMEN! Pay attention!”? The fact is it is a disservice to women (to say nothing of demeaning and insulting) to refer to them as “individuals with a cervix,” because if the whole point is about letting women know what they need to do to stay healthy they should be appealed to in direct and unambiguous ways.

Unfortunately, directness and dis-ambiguity are, as the citizens of Orwell’s Oceana might say, “doubleplus uncommon” nowadays. The irony, of course, is that these “individuals with a cervix” the Cancer Society is advising are going to go for their screenings and checkups to doctors called “gynecologists”—a word coming directly from the Greek word for woman, gyne (γυνή). How long, one wonders, until this medical title is deemed ungoodspeak, and swapped for the more cumbersome “doctors to individuals with a cervix”? I’d say that seems far-fetched—but then, I’d have said the same about this story five years ago…

Tags: gender ideologyhealthmedicineTransgenderism
Joseph Grabowski

Joseph Grabowski

Joseph Grabowski was the Executive Director of the International Organization for the Family until August 2022. He also served as Director of Communications for the National Organization for Marriage. Joseph has a B.A. in Philosophy from Saint Charles Borromeo Seminary, Overbrook and M.A. in English from Marquette University.  Joe has appeared as an expert on traditional marriage and family in local and nationwide media, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Boston Globe, Breitbart, and elsewhere. Joe’s writings on traditional marriage and family, as well as on Catholic Social Teaching and the writings of G. K. Chesterton and Hilaire Belloc, have appeared in The Stream, Gilbert Magazine, Ethika Politika, and The Distributist Review, and he has spoken at several national conferences on the place of G.K. Chesterton in 20th Century literature and thought.

Discussion about this post

Popular News

  • Lessons from a census: Why are there half a million fewer Serbs?

    7 shares 5.6k VIEWS
    Share 7 Tweet 0
  • WEF in Davos: Escort agencies fully booked

    1 shares 2.6k VIEWS
    Share 1 Tweet 0
  • “Dysconnected”: New documentary highlights dangers of transgender surgery

    25 shares 1.5k VIEWS
    Share 25 Tweet 0
  • British government vetoes Scottish parliament for the first time over transgender bill

    32 shares 1k VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 32
  • Men are guilty of being men

    14 shares 1k VIEWS
    Share 14 Tweet 0

Twitter iFamNewsEN

Tweets by @iFamNewsEN
IFN – International Family News Network

© 2022 IFN – International Family News - All Rights Reserved.

Quick Links

  • About iFamNews
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate

  • en English
  • it Italiano
  • es Español
  • fr Français
  • de Deutsch
  • pl Polski
  • sr српски
  • ru Русский
  • Login
  • Sign Up

© 2022 IFN – International Family News - All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Subscribe