• Latest
  • All
Tandon v. Newsom decision marks another victory for US religious conservatives

Tandon v. Newsom decision marks another victory for US religious conservatives

April 13, 2021
Canada: British Columbia first province to offer free contraception

Canada: British Columbia first province to offer free contraception

March 29, 2023
Jordan Peterson praises Hungarian family policy in face of demographic winter

Jordan Peterson praises Hungarian family policy in face of demographic winter

March 28, 2023
Portugal again in the streets: Defending life, fighting euthanasia

Portugal again in the streets: Defending life, fighting euthanasia

March 28, 2023
Children park

Italy’s center-right parties say “No” to EU certificate of filiation

March 27, 2023
people-street-city, people, street, city

How is the population policy in Europe? Seriously bad.

March 27, 2023
First plus-size and “transgender” models at Victoria’s Secret

First plus-size and “transgender” models at Victoria’s Secret

March 25, 2023
Italy: All children have the same rights and are entitled to a mother and father

Italy: All children have the same rights and are entitled to a mother and father

March 24, 2023
U.S. states and pro-life and pro-abortion legislation

U.S. states and pro-life and pro-abortion legislation

March 24, 2023
No evidence to support trans treatment for minors

No evidence to support trans treatment for minors

March 23, 2023
EU silent on the worrying rise of anti-Christian acts, vandalism throughout Europe

EU silent on the worrying rise of anti-Christian acts, vandalism throughout Europe

March 23, 2023
  • About iFamNews
  • Contact

Navigation Button Subscribe

  • Subscribe
March 29, 2023
  • Login
  • Register
No Result
View All Result
  • English
    • Italiano
    • Español
    • Français
    • Deutsch
    • Polski
    • српски
    • Русский

Navigation Button Donate

  • Donate
International Family News Network (IFN)
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
International Family News Network (IFN)
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
No Result
View All Result
International Family News Network (IFN)
No Result
View All Result

Tandon v. Newsom decision marks another victory for US religious conservatives

The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision paves the way for refusal to comply with California's COVID laws on religious grounds.

Damian Goddard by Damian Goddard
April 13, 2021
in Foreground, Politics
516
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0
Tandon v. Newsom decision marks another victory for US religious conservatives
Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on TelegramShare on TwitterShare on WeChat

Four months ago, the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in one of the most significant cases involving religious liberty in the past 30 years. And Friday’s ruling in Tandon v. Newsom is being recognized as yet another victory for religious conservatives in America.

In response to COVID-19, the state of California imposed restrictions on indoor gatherings. Those restrictions were subsequently challenged by a group of plaintiffs seeking to hold private religious gatherings both indoors and outdoors at their homes. The plaintiffs moved for a preliminary injunction to prohibit enforcement of the restrictions, but the motion was denied by a district court. The plaintiffs then appealed to the Ninth Circuit and moved for an injunction pending appeal. The Ninth Court denied that motion. The Supreme Court then stepped into the fray April 9th, holding that California’s COVID limitations on religious gatherings in homes likely violates the “Free Exercise Clause” of the First Amendment.

California limits gatherings in people’s homes to members of just three households. This blanket rule applies to any person or people gathering in a home for any reason, including religious ones.

A link here shows that the Supreme Court made four points in granting the application for a preliminary injunction pending the Ninth Circuit’s disposition of the appeal:

First, the Court stressed that government regulations are not neutral and generally applicable, and therefore trigger strict scrutiny under the Free Exercise Clause, “whenever they treat any comparable secular activity more favorably than religious exercise” (original emphasis). That a government treats some comparable secular activities “as poorly or even less favorably” than the religious activity at issue does not save the regulation under the Free Exercise Clause.

Second, the Court noted that “whether two activities are comparable for purposes of the Free Exercise Clause must be judged against the asserted government interest that justifies the regulation at issue.” Comparability must be assessed by the risks that various activities pose, rather than on the reasons why people gather.

Third, the government has the burden to establish that its restrictions on gatherings satisfy strict scrutiny. Narrow tailoring, a necessary predicate for strict scrutiny, requires that the government “do more than assert that certain risk factors ‘are always present in worship, or always absent from . . . secular activities’ the government may allow.” Instead, the government must show that, where it permits other activities to proceed with precautions, the “religious exercise at issue is more dangerous than those activities even when the same precautions are applied.”

Fourth, the Court concluded that even if the government withdraws or modifies a restriction during the course of litigation, it does not moot the case if the plaintiffs remain under a constant threat the government will reinstate the restriction.

On these four points, the Court concluded that the plaintiff’s challenge was likely to succeed. What has been made clear, and not just in California, is that these COVID restrictions seem to favour some gatherings over others. For instance, places such as “Big Box” stores and movie theatres welcome more people into a confined area than a household prayer gathering. The Supreme Court also observed that the lower courts could not prove that a retail store environment poses a lower risk of COVID transmission than a house prayer group.

In 1982’s United States v. Lee (1982), the Supreme Court ruled “when followers of a particular sect enter into commercial activity as a matter of choice, the limits they accept on their own conduct as a matter of conscience and faith are not to be superimposed on the statutory schemes which are binding on others in that activity.”

But there has been a marked shift in law pertaining to religious freedom, and detractors are willing to lay that at the feet of Amy Coney Barret’s nomination.

On November 25th, the Supreme Court ruled in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo that some houses of worship would be allowed to operate in defiance of New York state’s rules seeking to limit the spread of COVID-19.

In 2014’s Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, private businesses were permitted to refuse to include birth control coverage in its employees’ health plan despite a federal regulation requiring these businesses to do so. According to Vox, “Hobby Lobby established a strong presumption that when a religious objector seeks an exemption from a federal law, the objector will get that exemption barring unusual circumstances.”

Tags: conservativesCOVID-19first amendmentGavin NewsomHobby LobbyReligious FreedomReligious LibertyState of CaliforniaSupreme CourtTandon v. Newsom
Damian Goddard

Damian Goddard

Damian Goddard is a veteran television, radio, and internet broadcaster who garnered international headlines in May 2011 after taking to Twitter in defence of "the traditional and TRUE meaning of marriage".  Not twenty four hours after delivering the tweet, he was fired from his job as anchor for Rogers Sportsnet; one of Canada's two network sports broadcasters.  Damian's extensive broadcast experience also includes work as a news anchor at Sun News Network, a talkshow host at NewsTalk 1010 CFRB in Toronto, and ample experience in the sports realm working for the CBC, Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment (lead host at Raptors NBA TV and LeafsTV), and The Fan 590 in Toronto.  A history major with a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Western Ontario and a devout Roman Catholic, Damian is passionate about world and cultural affairs, the history and future of the Catholic Church, and the Toronto Maple Leafs.

Discussion about this post

Popular News

  • Woke policies of Disney gravely damaging the fortunes of the entertainment giant

    Woke policies of Disney gravely damaging the fortunes of the entertainment giant

    32 shares 14.4k VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 32
  • Thanks, Keith

    32 shares 2k VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 32
  • Giorgia Meloni warns: “Women are the first victims of gender ideology”

    1 shares 1.8k VIEWS
    Share 1 Tweet 0
  • Dedication in and for the world without sacrificing femininity

    32 shares 1.4k VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 32
  • Catholic Churches in Latin America defaced by feminists on March 8

    32 shares 1.3k VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 32

Twitter iFamNewsEN

Tweets by @iFamNewsEN
IFN – International Family News Network

© 2022 IFN – International Family News - All Rights Reserved.

Quick Links

  • About iFamNews
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate

  • en English
  • it Italiano
  • es Español
  • fr Français
  • de Deutsch
  • pl Polski
  • sr српски
  • ru Русский
  • Login
  • Sign Up

© 2022 IFN – International Family News - All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Subscribe