• Latest
  • All
Marriage and the Public Good: a book pointing the way forward to renewing a culture of marriage

Marriage and the Public Good: a book pointing the way forward to renewing a culture of marriage

November 16, 2022
Moira-Deeming-e-Kellie-Jay-Keen-Minshull

Australia, New Zealand: LGBT extremists attack women defending their sex against transgender abuse

March 31, 2023
Belgium, Germany heading towards less complicated procedure for legal change of gender

Belgium, Germany heading towards less complicated procedure for legal change of gender

March 30, 2023
IOF and NOM score victory against Amazon’s support of transgender violence

IOF and NOM score victory against Amazon’s support of transgender violence

March 29, 2023
Canada: British Columbia first province to offer free contraception

Canada: British Columbia first province to offer free contraception

March 29, 2023
Jordan Peterson praises Hungarian family policy in face of demographic winter

Jordan Peterson praises Hungarian family policy in face of demographic winter

March 28, 2023
Portugal again in the streets: Defending life, fighting euthanasia

Portugal again in the streets: Defending life, fighting euthanasia

March 28, 2023
Children park

Italy’s center-right parties say “No” to EU certificate of filiation

March 27, 2023
people-street-city, people, street, city

How is the population policy in Europe? Seriously bad.

March 27, 2023
First plus-size and “transgender” models at Victoria’s Secret

First plus-size and “transgender” models at Victoria’s Secret

March 25, 2023
Italy: All children have the same rights and are entitled to a mother and father

Italy: All children have the same rights and are entitled to a mother and father

March 24, 2023
  • About iFamNews
  • Contact

Navigation Button Subscribe

  • Subscribe
March 31, 2023
  • Login
  • Register
No Result
View All Result
  • English
    • Italiano
    • Español
    • Français
    • Deutsch
    • Polski
    • српски
    • Русский

Navigation Button Donate

  • Donate
International Family News Network (IFN)
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
International Family News Network (IFN)
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
No Result
View All Result
International Family News Network (IFN)
No Result
View All Result

Marriage and the Public Good: a book pointing the way forward to renewing a culture of marriage

We all know that the institution of marriage is in serious decline in America. Fewer people getting married each year. Over 40% of children being born out of wedlock. About half of all marriages ending in divorce. Marriage being redefined to include same-sex couples. We all know the dismal facts. However, in its book Marriage and the Public Good: Ten Principles, the Witherspoon Institute provides hope of reviving a culture of marriage in America (and the West in general) by giving us a solid public policy blueprint.

Cato by Cato
November 16, 2022
in Family, Foreground
374
Reading Time: 6 mins read
0
Marriage and the Public Good: a book pointing the way forward to renewing a culture of marriage
Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on TelegramShare on TwitterShare on WeChat

Last updated on November 18th, 2022 at 03:04 pm

Why is the Witherspoon Institute providing public policy recommendations when marriage is generally a cultural issue?

“Creating…a marriage culture is not a job for the government. Families, religious communities, and civic institutions must point the way. But law and public policy are also teachers; they will either reinforce and support these goals or undermine them. We call upon our nation’s leaders and our fellow citizens to support public policies that strengthen traditional marriage as a social institution.”  

In the book the Witherspoon Institute provides eight public policy proposals to restore marriage. First, the authors argue that we must “maintain the legal distinction between married and cohabiting couples.” They write:

“Powerful intellectual institutions in family law, including the American Law Institute, have proposed that America follow the path of many European nations and Canada in erasing the legal distinction between marriage and cohabitation. But since such a shift in law would create further harm by sending a false message to the next generation that marriage itself is irrelevant or secondary, we encourage our legislators to refuse to extend legal marital status to cohabiting couples.”

It wisely notes that since cohabiting couples have refused the obligations imposed by marriage, they should not have the benefits given to marriage in the law.

Second, the books states that we need to “investigate divorce-law reforms.” The authors open up discussion on this point by noting a terrible truth: “Under America’s current divorce system, courts today provide less protection for the marriage contract than they do for an ordinary business contract.” In essence, the contract you have with your employee is more binding than the marriage contract you have with your spouse. The authors propose several divorce-related reforms, including requiring divorcing couples to attend religious or secular pro-marriage counseling sessions before a divorce can be granted, allowing couples to enter into more binding marriage contracts at the outset, giving an innocent spouse a greater share of marital property, and creating secular and religious marriage education programs in communities with high rates of family non-formation or dissolution.

In regard to the argument that the above ideas may keep spouses in an abusive marriage, the authors declare:

“We affirm that protecting Americans from domestic violence and abuse is a critically important goal. But because both children and adults in nonmarital unions are at vastly increased risk for both, encouraging high rates of family fragmentation is not a good strategy for protecting them.”

Third, the book proposes the “end of marriage penalties for low-income Americans.” Indeed, should low-income people in America want to marry, they know that most likely they will lose tens of thousands of dollars in means-tested welfare payments by going the altar—and as a result many of them simply forego marriage. The authors write:

“A recent study found that where there was an anticipated loss of income-tax credit due to a marriage penalty, lower-income women were less likely to marry and more likely to cohabit; thus, financial disincentives are potentially affecting the marriage decisions of millions of low-income women. It is unconscionable that government levies substantial financial penalties on low-income parents who marry.” 

Some suggestions made by other organizations in this area include gradually phasing out welfare benefits if a person marries, doubling the means-tested income levels for married couples, and continuing government programs that specifically benefit children such as public health care and school meal programs after a parent marries.

Fourth, the book advocates “protect[ing] and expand[ing] pro-child and pro-family provisions in our tax code.” As the authors write: “The tax code ought to privilege institutions that stabilize society and help those making sacrifices to ensure the next generation.”

Fifth, the authors urge us to “protect the interests of children against a powerful fertility industry.” This industry promotes the interest of adults over children and very often deprives a child from a relationship with (or even knowing) one or both of his biological parents. Under this point the authors propose such things as banning anonymous sperm and egg donations, banning surrogacy, refusing to create fatherless children by holding sperm donors and/or clinics financially and legally responsible for any offspring that result, and restricting reproductive technologies to married heterosexual couples. As the authors declare:

“The most important forces underwriting the current United States fertility industry are not technological; they are social and legal. Both law and culture have stressed the interests of adults to the exclusion of the needs of children. Parents seeking children deserve our sympathy and support. But we ought not, in offering this, deliberately create an entire class of children deprived of their natural human right to know their own origins and to experience the unique love of both a mother and a father.”

Sixth, the book states we must “protect the freedom to live out and express belief in the uniqueness of traditional marriage without fear of government coercion and institutional hostility.” Indeed, all too often government “non-discrimination” laws punish people who hold traditional views of the family. The authors write:

“[F]aith-based adoption and foster-care providers have been forced to compromise their belief that placing children in homes with a mother and a father is in the best interest of the child—or to cease offering services entirely, leaving vulnerable children in need. In a similar way, sexual orientation and gender identity nondiscrimination laws are often used by their backers as a sword ‘to punish the wicked’.…” 

Seventh, the authors urge us to “protect the freedom to conduct scholarly inquiry and promote dissemination of accurate research findings on marriage and related topics.” They state:

“In tandem with the widespread misrepresentation of research findings both in academia and public media on the subject of marriage, a disturbing trend toward actual suppression of research based on ideological rather than scientific grounds appears to be emerging and altering the playing field in the study of sexuality and gender.”

The authors give the example of a peer-reviewed study linking social media use to an increase in gender-dysphoria among adolescent girls. Under pressure from the LGBT community, the university that published the study immediately took it off its website and the study’s editors were forced to issue a revised version of it (that ironically did not change the initial results).

And finally, the book advocates “restor[ing] the public understanding of marriage as uniquely the union of one man with one woman as husband and wife.” The authors note that while the erroneously decided 2015 United States Supreme Court decision will likely not be overturned anytime soon (but we thought the same about Roe v. Wade…), “we can seek to restore the public’s understanding of the unique goods of traditional marriage for society.”

In its book Marriage and the Public Good: Ten Principles, the Witherspoon Institute has provided us with some solid proposals on how to revitalize a culture of marriage in America—a culture that brings the most good to children, women, men, and society as a whole.  Indeed, the social science research from all sides of the political spectrum is virtually unanimous on the benefits provided by a healthy marriage composed of one woman and one man. As the authors conclude their work:

“Families, religious communities, community organizations, and public policymakers must work together toward a great goal: strengthening marriage so that each year more children are raised by their own mother and father in loving, lasting marital unions. The survival of the American experiment depends upon it. And our children deserve nothing less.”

Tags: lgbtmarriage and familynatural familyProtection of familysurrogacyWitherspoon Institute
Cato

Cato

Cato is a staunch defender of Western Civilization and the Judeo-Christian worldview. He will end all of his articles: "And the radical LGBT agenda must be defeated" as this is the pre-eminent battle of our day.

Discussion about this post

Popular News

  • Woke policies of Disney gravely damaging the fortunes of the entertainment giant

    Woke policies of Disney gravely damaging the fortunes of the entertainment giant

    32 shares 14.4k VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 32
  • Thanks, Keith

    32 shares 2.2k VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 32
  • Film “Jesus Revolution” exceeds all expectations at the box office

    32 shares 1.2k VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 32
  • Britain turns Orwellian: House of Commons passes bill introducing buffer zones

    32 shares 981 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 32
  • Italy: All children have the same rights and are entitled to a mother and father

    32 shares 969 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 32

Twitter iFamNewsEN

Tweets by @iFamNewsEN
IFN – International Family News Network

© 2022 IFN – International Family News - All Rights Reserved.

Quick Links

  • About iFamNews
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate

  • en English
  • it Italiano
  • es Español
  • fr Français
  • de Deutsch
  • pl Polski
  • sr српски
  • ru Русский
  • Login
  • Sign Up

© 2022 IFN – International Family News - All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Subscribe