Dr. Dragoljub Petrović, linguist and expert in Slavic languages: On the occasion of the recent harassment of a teacher in a Serbian school
- There is more crime in schools than in reputable country pubs
- It is easier to leave children to the streets and drugs than to get them used to work from an early age and prepare them to stay away from drugs. And that’s why it is meaningless to claim that “labor abuse of children is more present in rural areas” because in those areas children were “under the eye” of parents, neighbors, godparents and friends and no one could hide from them; in villages (while there was one) people had to work to provide for themselves, and in cities it was also possible to have some other skills that were useless in the village setting.
- Serbian “folk pedagogy”, as it was pointed out earlier, was much more grounded: watch the child’s behavior at an early age, then he will watch himself.
- The child, if no one stops him, punishes him and does not reason with him, will later become a servant of his bad habits. His bad behavior will become a habit, and he will become a useless member of society, a burden to his parents and a disgrace to many.
- Children should be protected both from the street and from those who leave them on the street. And from pedophile associations…
- The WHO advises that children aged 0–4 should be given “information about the enjoyment and pleasure of touching one’s own body … masturbation”
The recent harassment of a teacher in the town of Trstenik (central Serbia) and the crime against a child in Subotica (northern Serbia) are just a continuation of what the state has been doing with education over the last several decades, which leads to the fact that there is more crime in renowned schools than in renowned country pubs.
Ignorant ministers and their seducers for the destruction of education are acting in accordance with the best rules which, as far as I know, were explicitly formulated for the first time in the middle of the last century: “We will invest everything we have, all the gold, all the material aid and resources into processing and dumbing down people… We will sow chaos there and we will imperceptibly replace their true values with false ones and make them believe in all false values… We will in every way support and elevate the so-called artists who will begin to instill and drown in the human consciousness the cult of sex, violence, of sadism, treachery–in a word, all that is immoral. In the administration of the country, we will cause chaos and disorder… We will inculcate indolence and recklessness, lies and deception, alcoholism, drug addiction, animalistic fear of each other and shamelessness, treachery, nationalism and enmity between peoples, all this cunningly and imperceptibly… In this way, we will destroy one generation after another… We will do this to people from childhood and youth, our main item will always be the youth, we will destroy them, make them immoral, corrupt them. We will make them spies, cosmopolitans.”
Did we hear correctly: THEY are intent on destroying the world. And to do that, their shortcut will be the destruction of the youth.
Pay attention to the child’s behavior at an early age
And the Serbian state and its school are nicely integrated into those patterns. Thus, the Serbian state cares very much about, for example, children’s rights and, among other things, informs us about its intention to provide children with a commissioner, a protector to look after their rights. Considering that idea, I said that children should be protected from such protectors. And provide them with some much more important rights.
Let’s say: the right to be (naturally) born if they are (naturally) conceived. And if they are born, it is their right to grow up (naturally) and that not a single child should be among the 115,000 who “live in extreme poverty” or among the “three percent who work in life-threatening conditions.”
And it is their right not to find themselves under the protection of Labris or the Incest Trauma Center (LGBT NGOs in Serbia – ed.). Or those pedophile associations (founded by Kinsey and the Rockefellers) that demand that the age limit for engaging in sexual intercourse with children be lowered to under ten years. Or among those that cost 20,000 dollars on the international market (and who “die” for that money in maternity hospitals; and they say that there are four million such “murders” worldwide every year).
It is the child’s right not to be protected from parental love. So when the child is wayward and the soft words of his parents do not reach him, it will do him no harm if he is spanked slightly on his bottom (I know many grandmothers who asked for a “stick to caress their grandchildren’s bottoms”, and I also know fathers who took the children to the doctor when the child said “I can’t”, and when the child said “I won’t” – they would pick up that same stick). It is easier to leave children to the streets and drugs than to get them used to work from an early age and prepare them to get away from drugs. And that’s why it is meaningless to claim that “labor abuse of children is more present in rural areas” because in those areas children were “under the eye” of parents, neighbors, godparents and friends and no one could hide from them; in the village (while there was one) people had to work to provide for themselves, and in cities it was also possible to have some other skills that were useless in the village setting.
It is the right of a thirteen-year-old girl to “go out and have fun” late at night, but her old-fashioned grandfather should also be understood if, when she returns home at the break of dawn, he asks her what her “life” looks like there, i.e. is she using any drugs (and then is she “smoking weed” or “getting high”) or just “having sex” (and then does she only do it with “her boyfriend” or with whoever happens to be there). Such curiosity could have landed the grandfather in prison because he endangered the “integrity of the child” by not understanding “the orders of the new age, i.e. of the new world order”, i.e. what we quoted at the beginning as instructions for the destruction of the child’s psyche (and this includes, among other things, the accidental discovery of a teacher that his female students “cannot bear their virginity” so, in order to get rid of that burden, they stand “in line for drilling” with verified “drillers” – so that later they would not watch other guys being “unskilled” but rather they should be the ones teaching the guys how to do it properly).
And when we talk about all that, some thoughts will arise about what can be found in the “arsenal of fighters for children’s rights”. First of all, they have the power to impose certain “rights ” on their side which are directly directed against the humanity of the child, and among them it is worth highlighting, among others, the “recommendations of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child” which “provide an absolute ban on corporal punishment of children”; the law on this, which is being prepared in our country, as its proponents point out, will represent a “manual for the future that will guarantee fully rounded protection of the youngest”, but it is the Serbian “folk pedagogy”, as it was pointed out before, that was always much more grounded in this: pay attention to the child’s behavior at an early age, and later it will take care of itself.
That is what St. John Chrysostom spoke both simply and logically: “Some unreasonable parents completely neglect the upbringing of children at their early age. Let’s say a child does something bad, and an unreasonable and careless parent just waves his hand: “That’s okay, he’s still a child, he’s not aware of what he’s doing.” When he grows up, he will certainly not act like that”. Thus, the child grows up like a wild apple in the forest, in the wilderness. And if you pick the fruit from such an apple, you will not be happy – it will be sour and bitter. And so the child, if no one stops him, punishes him and does not reason with him, will later be formed as a servant of his bad affections. His bad behavior will become a habit, and he will become a useless member of society, a burden to his parents and a disgrace to many…
Failure to correct children’s mischief is a big mistake
There is nothing worse… than not correcting a child’s mischief and allowing it to become a habit. Those mischiefs, if neglected, spoil the child to such an extent that later there is no possibility to correct them with any advice, so the devil takes such children under his sway, doing with them wherever he wants. He becomes their sovereign commander, gives them disastrous advice, and the unfortunate children, without thinking that such advice is leading them to their undoing, gladly fulfill them.
The law we mentioned above stipulates that “street children shall enjoy special protection”, but this law as well as all other laws should in fact stipulate that no child should ever be found “in the street”. Therefore, children should be protected both from the street and from those who leave them out in the streets. And from pedophile associations, such as Labris and Incest Trauma Center. Or the Haver-Serbia Organization, which imposes the ideology of homosexuality by pulling teachers, and through them, elementary and secondary school students, into its “workshops”.
The state is solely responsible for the destruction of schools and maiming the nation
Children, in particular, should be protected from the World Health Organization (WHO), which published the document “Standards for sexuality education in Europe: A framework for politicians, education and health authorities and specialists” which advises that children be taught about masturbation and transgenderism before they even learn to speak… The WHO advises that children aged 0-4 be given “information about the enjoyment and pleasure of touching one’s own body … masturbation. “
It is the child’s right to grow up as a free and self-aware member of the community to which he belongs, and the state could help him in this, at least a little. If the state is free, that is. If its fate is not governed by the occupier – as it was shown in Trstenik and Subotica. When Serbia was a real state, it resolved such “excesses” immediately: bullies from Trstenik would be immediately sent “under the authority of the youth correction facility”, and those from Subotica would be caught by the public prosecutor “ex officio” and would not push the grieving father into becoming a vigilante, chasing the criminals who maimed his child. Or forcing him to prove that such children were pushed into a life of crime by the crippled state.
And that the state alone is responsible for the destruction of the school and the maiming of the nation.
Discussion about this post