• Latest
  • All
What comes first, safety or ideology?

What comes first, safety or ideology?

November 17, 2022
IOF’s joint statement for the 2022 Commission on the Status of Women

Protect and Promote Your National Treasure! IOF’s joint statement for the 2025 International Day of Families

May 15, 2025
Former Louisville University professor wins $1.6 million over dismissal for criticism of transgender treatments for children

Former Louisville University professor wins $1.6 million over dismissal for criticism of transgender treatments for children

April 26, 2025
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. Author: Alfredo Borba

Pope Francis passed away at the age of 88

April 21, 2025
Author: Tom Morris

U.K. Supreme Court defines woman based on biological sex

April 16, 2025
New Colorado bill punishes moms and dads for rejecting trans ideology

New Colorado bill punishes moms and dads for rejecting trans ideology

April 5, 2025
Female fencer Stephanie Turner faces penalties for refusal to compete against transgender opponent

Female fencer Stephanie Turner faces penalties for refusal to compete against transgender opponent

April 3, 2025
Georgia Governor to sign Riley Gaines Act of 2025, safeguarding women’s sports from transgender ideology

Georgia Governor to sign Riley Gaines Act of 2025, safeguarding women’s sports from transgender ideology

April 2, 2025
Humanity’s indispensable but unsung heroes

Humanity’s indispensable but unsung heroes

March 18, 2025
AfD politician slams leftist abortion agenda in staunchly pro-life speech

AfD politician slams leftist abortion agenda in staunchly pro-life speech

March 12, 2025
Maine locals rally against Governor Mills’ stance on transgender participation in sports

Maine locals rally against Governor Mills’ stance on transgender participation in sports

March 1, 2025
  • About iFamNews
  • Contact

Navigation Button Subscribe

  • Subscribe
May 16, 2025
  • Login
  • Register
No Result
View All Result
  • English
    • Italiano
    • Español
    • Français
    • Deutsch
    • Polski
    • српски
    • Русский
    • Hrvatski

Navigation Button Donate

  • Donate
International Family News Network (IFN)
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
International Family News Network (IFN)
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
No Result
View All Result
International Family News Network (IFN)
No Result
View All Result

What comes first, safety or ideology?

In a world where it is imperative not to hurt feelings of a certain group, it becomes irrelevant if someone actually gets hurt along the way. As long as we are all being "inclusive."

Mara Fabris by Mara Fabris
November 17, 2022
in Foreground, Opinion
146
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
What comes first, safety or ideology?

Photo: personal archive

Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on TelegramShare on TwitterShare on WeChat

Autumn is beautiful across the European continent, with October being a particularly good month for city breaks and business trips. The ever-changing European capitals have a lot to offer in all seasons, pleasant surprises and shocks alike.

After many years I found myself in London. The city of wonders, big enough for all, always ready to absorb everything and anything, looked more tiresome than ever. What has happened to it? Has it finally grown too tired of all its diversities and differences? Is it pushing too hard to accept what it should not? But, what could that be?

The old English saying “Better safe than sorry” seems to have lost its meaning. Strange as it is, it seems some things have grown more important over the years. Conveying certain messages, no matter the cost, is one of them.

To an average tourist, who may have come to London from across the Atlantic, from Europe, or the other side of the world, crossing a street might prove a bit of a challenge. The “Look Right” warnings displayed on nearly each and every pedestrian crossing in the city centre are there for a reason. A good reason. Half of the world first looks left when stepping onto the street to cross it. Foreigners flock to the Trafalgar Square by the million every year, for example. They admire Nelson and even more the wonderful collection of the finest art stored in the National Gallery. However, there is a significant obstacle to an alien pedestrian trying to find their way around.

It took me a couple of minutes to understand what I was seeing. The moment of enlightenment happened when I realised that all who had been patiently waiting for the traffic lights to change to green for pedestrians, began crossing the street, except myself. I remained standing, still waiting for the light to change to green. The green light, or whatever was left of it, being unusually short, changed back to red before I knew it, so I was still standing motionless looking at the traffic lights. Then the light went green again, green with a message, which I then understood.

I wondered if it was really necessary. I also wondered if some might find the message offending. There are children crossing the street at those particular traffic lights all day, every day, and they need a clear sign of safety. There are people of all religions and beliefs who might find the message insulting. Finally, are the traffic lights a medium that should bear any kind of message or warning, apart from the one that concerns safety? Is this what the Western society has come down to? What are our priorities today? Moments later, I was at another pedestrian crossing nearby, with another traffic light which showed this:

Again, I remained still while others were crossing the street. But this time I was motionless because I could not understand what the sign meant. I searched and stretched my brains in vain – I had never seen it before. I had no idea what the message was, except that it was approved, or at least that someone wanted to approve of it, so they tried really hard to install it deep into our minds, right down to our basic modern understanding of safety and protection – see green, think safe, think accepted, sort of thing.

I felt confused, defeated, even betrayed. I wondered why it was necessary for those signs to be displayed there and then, on one of the busiest squares in one of the busiest cities in the world, despite everybody’s need to receive just one message – when it is safe to cross the street and not get run over.

From that moment on, I realised it that it no longer mattered what the traffic lights in central London were showing, since neither the safety nor well-being of all participants in traffic were a priority. So, I responded to the green lights the best I could. I did not cross a street at the traffic lights again, green or not. Instead, I tried to look at the faces of the drivers whose paths I was crossing. Their faces were usually red and their hands up in the air in disbelief, I think, but I made sure I waved to them and always smiled. And we all got the message.

Tags: LGBT ideologyLGBT+LondontotalitarianismUnited Kingdom
Mara Fabris

Mara Fabris

Discussion about this post

Popular News

  • The new Pope is Robert Prevost, and his name will be Leo XIV. He continues to be denounced in Peru for covering up sexual abuse by priests.

    The new Pope is Robert Prevost, and his name will be Leo XIV. He continues to be denounced in Peru for covering up sexual abuse by priests.

    0 shares 45 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Two Spanish ministers denounced for embezzlement in contracts awarded to Tragsa

    0 shares 41 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Habemus Papam! Fumata blanca: first article of the new pontificate of Esperanza

    0 shares 30 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Tailor-made consistories: how Francis manipulated the conclave

    0 shares 30 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Christian Lawyers request to the City Council of Callosa (Alicante) the replacement of the cross after confirming that the re-signified crosses do not violate the Law of Historical Memory.

    0 shares 19 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0

IFN – International Family News Network

© 2022 IFN – International Family News - All Rights Reserved.

Quick Links

  • About iFamNews
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Subscribe

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate

  • en English
  • it Italiano
  • es Español
  • fr Français
  • de Deutsch
  • pl Polski
  • sr српски
  • ru Русский
  • hr Hrvatski
  • Login
  • Sign Up

© 2022 IFN – International Family News - All Rights Reserved.