• Latest
  • All
It is time to ban commercial surrogacy

It is time to ban commercial surrogacy

August 19, 2021
Kentucky’s abortion ban upheld after lawsuit dropped

Kentucky’s abortion ban upheld after lawsuit dropped

June 4, 2025
Jersey’s trans inclusion guidance sparks parental outrage

Jersey’s trans inclusion guidance sparks parental outrage

May 27, 2025
IOF’s joint statement for the 2022 Commission on the Status of Women

Protect and Promote Your National Treasure! IOF’s joint statement for the 2025 International Day of Families

May 15, 2025
Former Louisville University professor wins $1.6 million over dismissal for criticism of transgender treatments for children

Former Louisville University professor wins $1.6 million over dismissal for criticism of transgender treatments for children

April 26, 2025
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. Author: Alfredo Borba

Pope Francis passed away at the age of 88

April 21, 2025
Author: Tom Morris

U.K. Supreme Court defines woman based on biological sex

April 16, 2025
New Colorado bill punishes moms and dads for rejecting trans ideology

New Colorado bill punishes moms and dads for rejecting trans ideology

April 5, 2025
Female fencer Stephanie Turner faces penalties for refusal to compete against transgender opponent

Female fencer Stephanie Turner faces penalties for refusal to compete against transgender opponent

April 3, 2025
Georgia Governor to sign Riley Gaines Act of 2025, safeguarding women’s sports from transgender ideology

Georgia Governor to sign Riley Gaines Act of 2025, safeguarding women’s sports from transgender ideology

April 2, 2025
Humanity’s indispensable but unsung heroes

Humanity’s indispensable but unsung heroes

March 18, 2025
  • About iFamNews
  • Contact

Navigation Button Subscribe

  • Subscribe
June 6, 2025
  • Login
  • Register
No Result
View All Result
  • English
    • Italiano
    • Español
    • Français
    • Deutsch
    • Polski
    • српски
    • Русский
    • Hrvatski

Navigation Button Donate

  • Donate
International Family News Network (IFN)
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
International Family News Network (IFN)
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
No Result
View All Result
International Family News Network (IFN)
No Result
View All Result

It is time to ban commercial surrogacy

Commercial surrogacy is a threat to children, women, and the family. And if the female body continues to be viewed as a money-making machine, it will deprive humanity of its God-given dignity and take us down a road we should tremble to travel.

Cato by Cato
August 19, 2021
in Family, Opinion
1.1k
Reading Time: 6 mins read
0
It is time to ban commercial surrogacy
Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on TelegramShare on TwitterShare on WeChat

“Surrogacy raises grave moral concerns, and powerfully undermines the dignity of human procreation, particularly when it comes to the women and children involved in the process,” writes Father Tad Pacholczyk in his article “The multiple moral problems of surrogacy.” The Center for Bioethics and Culture declares, “A few of the many issues raised by surrogacy include: the rights of children produced; the ethical and practical ramifications of the further commodification of women’s bodies; the exploitation of poor and low-income women desperate for money; the moral and ethical consequences of transforming a normal biological function of a woman’s body into a commercial transaction.” “Womb rental (also known as surrogacy) is a serious violation of women’s and children’s rights and dignity. It is indeed a form of reproductive exploitation of women that treats newborns as commodities that are subject to commercial agreements,” agrees the Coalition for the Abolition of Surrogate Motherhood. Indeed, because commercial surrogacy gravely harms women and children, and commodifies an act that should be the culmination of the love of two married parents, commercial surrogacy should be outlawed in the United States and around the world.

What is commercial surrogacy? In brief, it is paying a “surrogate” woman to gestate and bear the child of another “commissioning” couple or individual, who will then take the child from the surrogate at birth. As the Heritage Foundation describes it in its report How Surrogacy Harms Women and Children:

“In a surrogacy arrangement, a woman carries a child for an individual or couple who is unable to do so themselves. Sometimes the child is genetically related to the commissioning parents, but often donor gametes are used, and the child is related to only one, or in some cases neither, of the commissioning parents. Sometimes the surrogate mother is genetically related to the child she carries, but often she is not. Some surrogacy arrangements are domestic, but many commissioning parents pursue international surrogacy arrangements, which adds an additional layer of logistical and legal difficulties.”

While commercial surrogacy is a huge business around the world–expecting to generate almost $28 billion a year by 2025–how it is regulated differs from country to country. For example in Germany and France it is prohibited, while in Russia and Ukraine it is somewhat regulated. In other countries, especially developing nations, it is not regulated at all. In the United States, there is no federal law regulating commercial surrogacy, and different states have taken different approaches. As the Heritage Foundation writes: “Within the United States, a patchwork of laws makes for a Wild West situation. Some states allow commercial surrogacy, some limit surrogacy to altruistic arrangements, and some do not recognize surrogacy contracts.”

Why should commercial surrogacy be banned? First and foremost, it exploits women; especially poor women. As The Center for Bioethics and Culture states: “Surrogacy often depends on the exploitation of low income and poor women by those with means to pay for surrogacy. These unequal transactions result in ‘uninformed’ consent, coercion, low payments, poor health care, and severe risks to the short- and long-term health of women.” Indeed, many poor women do turn to surrogacy as a way to escape grinding poverty, despite the risks. For example, in Ukraine–a hotspot for international surrogacy–a woman can earn over eight times as much through surrogacy as she can from a typical job. The returns are even higher in the developing world. In the United States, surrogates can earn over $50,000 per birth.

Tragically, surrogacy is now emerging as an underreported form of human trafficking. As the Heritage Foundation writes:

“Sadly, the international surrogacy market appears to have significant and growing overlap with human trafficking. Given the amount of money involved, traffickers stand to profit substantially from selling women and girls into surrogacy arrangements. As Dr. Sheela Saravanan, author of A Transnational Feminist View of Surrogacy Biomarkets in India, wrote in a submission to the UN Special Rapporteur on the sale and sexual exploitation of children, ‘The surrogacy trafficking trade used the same network that was used for domestic work and sex trade from the poor regions of India into urban areas. These unmarried girls [were] impregnated with embryos without their consent. Others were confined in homes and when some girls tried to run away, they [were] caught, brought back and beaten.”

The Coalition for the Abolition of Surrogate Motherhood agrees: “The womb-rental industry operates in developing countries using the same criminal strategies [of] those of the human trafficking networks. These tactics include the identification and recruitment of women in vulnerable situation[s] so that they are more likely to rent their wombs for money.”

In an effort to stop the exploitation of their vulnerable women, the international surrogacy havens of India, Thailand, Mexico, Nepal, and Cambodia have recently prohibited surrogacy involving foreigners.

Commercial surrogacy should also be banned because it greatly harms children. As the Heritage Foundation states: “All too often, the desires of adults—namely, the commissioning parent(s)—supersede the interests of children. Unfortunately, discussions of surrogacy in media—and culture more broadly—rarely focus on the later.” Indeed, commercial surrogacy harms children in several significant ways. First, in cases where the child is not created using both the egg and sperm of a commissioning couple, the child is intentionally being deprived of one or both of his biological parents. In the cases of an individual or a homosexual couple commissioning the surrogacy, or where the egg of the surrogate will be used, this fact is obvious. And as research from the left, right, and center show, children raised in households outside of a married biological mother-father family face significantly greater risks of negative outcomes, such as doing poorly in and dropping out of school, using drugs and alcohol, engaging in early sexual activity and having out-of-wedlock children, committing crime, and having lower future earnings. Significantly, these risks persist even when controlling for family income. And even in cases where the child will be the biological offspring of the commissioning couple, we are intentionally destroying the bond that developed between the child and the surrogate mother over the nine months of the pregnancy; a bond that doctors normally highly encourage.

Second, commercial surrogacy harms children by placing them at greater risk even before being born. The commissioning party can pressure the surrogate to abort a child if the child shows signs of abnormality, or if more embryos implant than the party contracted for (which is more common with in-vitro fertilizations). Sadly, some surrogacy contracts specifically allow a commissioning party to require an abortion in such circumstances.

Third, children born through commercial surrogacy face unique circumstances due to its commercial nature. For example, a couple who contracted with a surrogate mother took home the healthy baby girl that the mother delivered but refused to take her twin brother who had Downs syndrome. In another case, a couple that contracted with a surrogate divorced before the baby was born. After the birth of the child, neither the contacting mother nor the surrogate mother wanted the child, while the father was prohibited by local law from adopting as he was single.

Finally, commercial surrogacy should be banned because it commodifies what should not be commodified. As the Center for Bioethics and Culture states:

“Surrogacy is another form of the commodification of women’s bodies. Surrogate services are advertised, surrogates are recruited, and operating agencies make large profits. The commercialism of surrogacy raises fears of a black market and baby selling, of breeding farms, turning impoverished women into baby producers and the possibility of selective breeding at a price. Surrogacy degrades a pregnancy to a service and a baby to a product.”

Having a baby should be the culmination of the love between a married mother and father, who will create a loving home for the child; not the result of an impersonal contract drafted by backroom lawyers. Putting a value on the female body and the children it can produce deprives humans of their God-given dignity and will take us down a road we should tremble to travel.

Because it greatly harms women and children, and commodifies an inherently invaluable act, commercial surrogacy must be banned in America and the rest of the world. As the Heritage Foundation concludes in its report How Surrogacy Harms Women and Children:

“Opposition to surrogacy is not a simple left versus right issue, and people across the political spectrum can agree that American [and indeed international] laws and society need to prioritize the dignity and health of women, the needs of children, and the fundamental human rights of all individuals when addressing the matter of surrogacy.”

Tags: ChildrenfamilypregnancysurrogacyWomen
Cato

Cato

Cato is a staunch defender of Western Civilization and the Judeo-Christian worldview. He will end all of his articles: "And the radical LGBT agenda must be defeated" as this is the pre-eminent battle of our day.

Discussion about this post

Popular News

  • Jersey’s trans inclusion guidance sparks parental outrage

    Jersey’s trans inclusion guidance sparks parental outrage

    0 shares 20 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Kentucky’s abortion ban upheld after lawsuit dropped

    0 shares 19 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Justice continues with the proceedings against the organizers of the procession of the “Santina Queer” in Gijon after the complaint of Christian Lawyers.

    0 shares 17 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Christian Lawyers request to Justice the withdrawal of a coloring booklet in the city hall of Ciudad Real(Spain)

    0 shares 17 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Christian Lawyers once again paralyzes the demolition of a cross, in this case in Teruel (Spain).

    0 shares 9 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0

IFN – International Family News Network

© 2022 IFN – International Family News - All Rights Reserved.

Quick Links

  • About iFamNews
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Subscribe

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate

  • en English
  • it Italiano
  • es Español
  • fr Français
  • de Deutsch
  • pl Polski
  • sr српски
  • ru Русский
  • hr Hrvatski
  • Login
  • Sign Up

© 2022 IFN – International Family News - All Rights Reserved.