• Latest
  • All
Shutting Down “Open Debate”

Shutting Down “Open Debate”

July 13, 2020
IOF’s joint statement for the 2022 Commission on the Status of Women

Protect and Promote Your National Treasure! IOF’s joint statement for the 2025 International Day of Families

May 15, 2025
Former Louisville University professor wins $1.6 million over dismissal for criticism of transgender treatments for children

Former Louisville University professor wins $1.6 million over dismissal for criticism of transgender treatments for children

April 26, 2025
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. Author: Alfredo Borba

Pope Francis passed away at the age of 88

April 21, 2025
Author: Tom Morris

U.K. Supreme Court defines woman based on biological sex

April 16, 2025
New Colorado bill punishes moms and dads for rejecting trans ideology

New Colorado bill punishes moms and dads for rejecting trans ideology

April 5, 2025
Female fencer Stephanie Turner faces penalties for refusal to compete against transgender opponent

Female fencer Stephanie Turner faces penalties for refusal to compete against transgender opponent

April 3, 2025
Georgia Governor to sign Riley Gaines Act of 2025, safeguarding women’s sports from transgender ideology

Georgia Governor to sign Riley Gaines Act of 2025, safeguarding women’s sports from transgender ideology

April 2, 2025
Humanity’s indispensable but unsung heroes

Humanity’s indispensable but unsung heroes

March 18, 2025
AfD politician slams leftist abortion agenda in staunchly pro-life speech

AfD politician slams leftist abortion agenda in staunchly pro-life speech

March 12, 2025
Maine locals rally against Governor Mills’ stance on transgender participation in sports

Maine locals rally against Governor Mills’ stance on transgender participation in sports

March 1, 2025
  • About iFamNews
  • Contact

Navigation Button Subscribe

  • Subscribe
May 24, 2025
  • Login
  • Register
No Result
View All Result
  • English
    • Italiano
    • Español
    • Français
    • Deutsch
    • Polski
    • српски
    • Русский
    • Hrvatski

Navigation Button Donate

  • Donate
International Family News Network (IFN)
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
International Family News Network (IFN)
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
No Result
View All Result
International Family News Network (IFN)
No Result
View All Result

Shutting Down “Open Debate”

The Letter on Justice and Open Debate is rather a breath of fresh air—a bold move by people with wildly different views, willing to take a public stand together and say that discourse is being endangered.

Nicole King by Nicole King
July 13, 2020
in Breaking News, Culture, Foreground
1.3k
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Shutting Down “Open Debate”
Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on TelegramShare on TwitterShare on WeChat

Harper’s magazine published last Tuesday “A Letter on Justice and Open Debate,” a call for “[t]he free exchange of information and ideas, the lifeblood of a liberal society,” which the signatories to the letter believe “is daily becoming more constricted.” The letter was signed by some dozens of artists, intellectuals, and leading public figures, including David Brooks, Salman Rushdie, Margaret Atwood, Gloria Steinem, David Frum, and J.K. Rowling—leftists and neoconservatives, black and white, male and female, trans, gay, and heterosexual are all represented.

The letter is short, a mere three paragraphs. It opens, “Our cultural institutions are facing a moment of trial. Powerful protests for racial and social justice are leading to overdue demands for police reform, along with wider calls for greater equality and inclusion across our society . . . ” But alongside such disruptions, a new regime has arisen, one which tends “to weaken our norms of open debate and toleration of differences in favor of ideological conformity.”

Such attacks on free speech, the signatories acknowledge, is something they “have come to expect . . . on the radical right,” but now “an intolerance of opposing views, a vogue for public shaming and ostracism, and the tendency to dissolve complex policy issues in a blinding moral certainty” are becoming widespread. “This stifling atmosphere,” the letter closes, “will ultimately harm the most vital causes of our time.”

The letter has quickly gained widespread notoriety, with many finding it offensive and annoying. Jeff Yang at CNN calls it “self-interested and elitist at best.” But leading black intellectual Gregory Pardlo (who signed the letter) told The New York Times, “It seems some of the conversation has turned to who the signatories are more than the content of the letter.” Particular ire has been leveled at the inclusion of J.K Rowling, who (as iFamNews has reported) recently came under intense fire for asserting the reality of biological sex, to the outcry of transgender activists around the globe. Indeed, as if to emphasize the point the letter makes, transgender critic-at-large at Vox Emily VanDerWerff posted on Twitter a letter that she had sent to her editors, complaining that Vox coworker Matthew Yglesias had signed the Letter on Justice. Other original signers have backed out, claiming they did not know who the other signatories were.

The whole thing is rather an interesting commentary on the state of discourse in America, wherein even leading leftist intellectuals are arguing that public Internet shaming and the shutting down of all dissent has gone way too far. And yet, as the blowback to this letter shows, even politically and culturally leftist leanings or opinions are not enough to shelter these signers from attack. Note the example of VanDerWerff, criticizing a respected coworker’s signature in part because of the letter’s supposed “dog whistles toward anti-trans positions” but also largely because in signing, Yglesia was keeping company with “several prominent anti-trans voices.” We cannot even keep company, the message goes, with people who have reasoned objections to our own opinions.

The left has often accused pro-family forces of being exclusionary of alternate family forms, or (as in this letter) accused the “radical right” of being the ones who shut down debate. But historically, the pro-family movement has shown remarkable inclusion and diversity, working across the aisle to promote marriage, or to better the lives of children, or to promote religious freedom for all. The Letter on Justice and Open Debate is rather a breath of fresh air—a bold move by people with wildly different views, willing to take a public stand together and say that discourse is being endangered. “We are already paying the price,” they say, “in greater risk aversion among writers, artists, and journalists who fear for their livelihoods if they depart from the consensus, or even lack sufficient zeal in agreement.”

And yet, already, forces are arguing that even calling for free speech is a radical act, and partnering with people with whom one disagrees to impart a common message is a dangerous move.

Let’s hope the backlash to the letter makes clear how necessary its message is.

Tags: freedom of speech
Nicole King

Nicole King

Nicole M. King is the Managing Editor of IOF's journal, The Natural Family: An International Journal of Research and Policy, the United States’ leading journal of family-policy research. In that capacity, she writes, edits and corresponds with editors and contributors to ensure that each issue provides the most relevant and accurate research and policy analysis available. Nicole holds a B.A. in English as well as M.A.s in English and Political Theory. She has contributed to The Front Porch Republic and Chronicles: A Magazine of American Culture, among others. She is also a contributing editor to SALVO Magazine and a blogger at salvomag.com.

Discussion about this post

Popular News

  • IOF’s joint statement for the 2022 Commission on the Status of Women

    Protect and Promote Your National Treasure! IOF’s joint statement for the 2025 International Day of Families

    0 shares 63 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Exclusive interview with the Cardinal who fought for the canonization of Francisco and Jacinta of Fatima: José Saraiva Martins (I)

    0 shares 2 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Catalonia: Christian Lawyers, representing the father, appeals Noelia’s euthanasia authorization.

    0 shares 1 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0

IFN – International Family News Network

© 2022 IFN – International Family News - All Rights Reserved.

Quick Links

  • About iFamNews
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Subscribe

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate

  • en English
  • it Italiano
  • es Español
  • fr Français
  • de Deutsch
  • pl Polski
  • sr српски
  • ru Русский
  • hr Hrvatski
  • Login
  • Sign Up

© 2022 IFN – International Family News - All Rights Reserved.