• Latest
  • All
Affirmative Action and quotas: time for the Supreme Court to finally end them

Affirmative Action and quotas: time for the Supreme Court to finally end them

February 15, 2022
Jersey’s trans inclusion guidance sparks parental outrage

Jersey’s trans inclusion guidance sparks parental outrage

May 27, 2025
IOF’s joint statement for the 2022 Commission on the Status of Women

Protect and Promote Your National Treasure! IOF’s joint statement for the 2025 International Day of Families

May 15, 2025
Former Louisville University professor wins $1.6 million over dismissal for criticism of transgender treatments for children

Former Louisville University professor wins $1.6 million over dismissal for criticism of transgender treatments for children

April 26, 2025
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. Author: Alfredo Borba

Pope Francis passed away at the age of 88

April 21, 2025
Author: Tom Morris

U.K. Supreme Court defines woman based on biological sex

April 16, 2025
New Colorado bill punishes moms and dads for rejecting trans ideology

New Colorado bill punishes moms and dads for rejecting trans ideology

April 5, 2025
Female fencer Stephanie Turner faces penalties for refusal to compete against transgender opponent

Female fencer Stephanie Turner faces penalties for refusal to compete against transgender opponent

April 3, 2025
Georgia Governor to sign Riley Gaines Act of 2025, safeguarding women’s sports from transgender ideology

Georgia Governor to sign Riley Gaines Act of 2025, safeguarding women’s sports from transgender ideology

April 2, 2025
Humanity’s indispensable but unsung heroes

Humanity’s indispensable but unsung heroes

March 18, 2025
AfD politician slams leftist abortion agenda in staunchly pro-life speech

AfD politician slams leftist abortion agenda in staunchly pro-life speech

March 12, 2025
  • About iFamNews
  • Contact

Navigation Button Subscribe

  • Subscribe
June 4, 2025
  • Login
  • Register
No Result
View All Result
  • English
    • Italiano
    • Español
    • Français
    • Deutsch
    • Polski
    • српски
    • Русский
    • Hrvatski

Navigation Button Donate

  • Donate
International Family News Network (IFN)
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
International Family News Network (IFN)
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
No Result
View All Result
International Family News Network (IFN)
No Result
View All Result

Affirmative Action and quotas: time for the Supreme Court to finally end them

The discriminatory policies of Jim Crow, promoted by leftists, are alive and well. But there are three major reasons as to why affirmative action and hiring quotas need to come to an end in America.

Cato by Cato
February 15, 2022
in Opinion
165
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Affirmative Action and quotas: time for the Supreme Court to finally end them
Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on TelegramShare on TwitterShare on WeChat

It is time for affirmative action and quotas to end in America. And there is a solid chance this could happen later this year when the U.S. Supreme court hears the case Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College, my alma mater. While there are many reasons for affirmative action and quotas to end, three stand out: 1) they denigrate the principle of merit; 2) they discriminate against “successful” minorities; and 3) they are a 500-lb anvil on the scales of justice.

First, affirmative action and quotas should end because they denigrate the principle of merit. One of the central tenets of the American creed is that people will be judged as individuals, not as members of groups, and therefore will rise or fall based on their individual character and competence. Indeed, this is precisely what Martin Luther King, Jr., fought for: that people would be judged on their merit rather than their skin color or any other inherent characteristic that has no bearing on merit. Affirmative action and quotas support the exact opposite principle, that race, ethnicity, sex, and the like should be taken into account when hiring, promoting, admitting to college, and awarding government grants to people. This is none other than a continuation of the discriminatory policies of Jim Crow in the South.

Second, affirmative action and quotas should end because they actually discriminate against “successful” minorities. For example, Americans of Asian descent are not considered “minorities” for college admissions because they are extremely qualified academically. Indeed, because they are so qualified affirmative action policies and quotas actually discriminate against them in admissions. This is why the Students for Fair Admission is suing Harvard College.

Third, affirmative action and quotas should end because they are a 500-lb anvil on the scales of justice. Proponents of affirmative actions and quotas are fond of saying that these policies are “just a finger on the scales of justice” and that minorities that are admitted to prestigious colleges, hired and promoted by companies, and given government grants are “just as qualified” as white and Asian applicants that were denied college admissions, jobs, and the like. Yet research shows that this is definitively false; affirmative action and quotas are not a finger by rather a 500-lb anvil on the scales of justices. For example, Harvard’s own Office of Institutional Research found that Blacks are admitted at 15 times the rate and Hispanics are admitted at 4 times the rate their academic qualifications would suggest. As Manhattan Institute scholar Heather MacDonald writes:

“If Harvard admitted students based on their academic qualifications alone, Harvard would be 43 percent Asian, 38.4 percent white, 0.7 percent black, and 2.4 percent Hispanic, according to a 2013 study by Harvard’s Office of Institutional Research. Instead, Harvard’s undergraduates in 2013 were 43.2 percent white, 18.7 percent Asian, 10.5 percent black, and 9.5 percent Hispanic.”

Likewise, Duke professor Peter Arcidiacono estimates that compared to a similarly qualified non-disadvantaged Asian male, an Hispanic applicant is 3 times more likely to be admitted to Harvard while a Black applicant is 4 times more likely to be admitted to Harvard. Arcidiacono writes:

“Race plays a significant role in admissions decisions. Consider the example of an Asian-American applicant who is male, is not disadvantaged, and has other characteristics that result in a 25% chance of admission… Changing his race to Hispanic (and leaving all other characteristics the same) would increase his chance of admission to 77%. Changing his race to African-American (again, leaving all other characteristics the same) would increase his chance of admission to 95%.”

Similar disparities have been found at other schools. For example, one study cited by MacDonald in her book The Diversity Delusion found that black applicants were up to 15 times more likely to be admitted to the UC Berkeley Law School than similarly qualified white applicants.

These statistics demonstrate that a person’s race really is playing a huge role in who gets into universities; clearly more than a finger is being placed on the scale.

Because they oppose the principle of merit, discriminate against successful minorities, and place a 500-lb anvil on the scales of justice, affirmative action and quotas need to end in America. And with the case Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College, the Supreme Court has the opportunity to do just that. Let’s hope that the Court has the courage to do the right thing.

Tags: affirmative actionHarvard CollegeHeather MacDonaldPeter ArcidiaconoQuotasSupreme Court
Cato

Cato

Cato is a staunch defender of Western Civilization and the Judeo-Christian worldview. He will end all of his articles: "And the radical LGBT agenda must be defeated" as this is the pre-eminent battle of our day.

Discussion about this post

Popular News

  • Jersey’s trans inclusion guidance sparks parental outrage

    Jersey’s trans inclusion guidance sparks parental outrage

    0 shares 18 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Justice continues with the proceedings against the organizers of the procession of the “Santina Queer” in Gijon after the complaint of Christian Lawyers.

    0 shares 17 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Christian Lawyers request to Justice the withdrawal of a coloring booklet in the city hall of Ciudad Real(Spain)

    0 shares 17 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Christian Lawyers once again paralyzes the demolition of a cross, in this case in Teruel (Spain).

    0 shares 9 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Christian Lawyers takes to court the government’s request for the resignification of the Valley for including parts of the Basilica, such as the Chapel of the Blessed Sacrament.

    0 shares 8 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0

IFN – International Family News Network

© 2022 IFN – International Family News - All Rights Reserved.

Quick Links

  • About iFamNews
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Subscribe

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate

  • en English
  • it Italiano
  • es Español
  • fr Français
  • de Deutsch
  • pl Polski
  • sr српски
  • ru Русский
  • hr Hrvatski
  • Login
  • Sign Up

© 2022 IFN – International Family News - All Rights Reserved.