• Latest
  • All
A “Big Tent” — Or Merely a Circus?

A “Big Tent” — Or Merely a Circus?

August 20, 2020
Pope Leo condems Catholic pro-abortion politicians

Pope Leo condems Catholic pro-abortion politicians

August 28, 2025
Creator: Michael Wuertenberg | Credit: swiss-image.ch Copyright: World Economic Forum/swiss-image.ch

Trump calls for RICO charges against George Soros

August 27, 2025
The Mirror

Catholic school shooter identified as transgender

August 27, 2025
America’s largest Planned Parenthood to close its doors

America’s largest Planned Parenthood to close its doors

August 26, 2025
Study shows 2.8 million Americans aged 13 years or older identify as transgender

Study shows 2.8 million Americans aged 13 years or older identify as transgender

August 26, 2025
Report shows English coucils allow gender transitions without parental knowledge

Report shows English coucils allow gender transitions without parental knowledge

August 26, 2025
Activists oppose subversive abortion group in Kenya

Activists oppose subversive abortion group in Kenya

August 25, 2025
Texas governor signs bill banning taxpayer spending on abortion

Texas governor signs bill banning taxpayer spending on abortion

August 25, 2025
Dr. James C. Dobson passes away at 89

Dr. James C. Dobson passes away at 89

August 21, 2025
Cracker Barrel unveils soulless new logo

Cracker Barrel unveils soulless new logo

August 21, 2025
  • About iFamNews
  • Contact

Navigation Button Subscribe

  • Subscribe
August 29, 2025
  • Login
  • Register
No Result
View All Result
  • English
    • Italiano
    • Español
    • Français
    • Deutsch
    • Polski
    • српски
    • Русский
    • Hrvatski

Navigation Button Donate

  • Donate
International Family News Network (IFN)
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
International Family News Network (IFN)
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
No Result
View All Result
International Family News Network (IFN)
No Result
View All Result

A “Big Tent” — Or Merely a Circus?

Despite their ostensible "diversity," the Democratic convention shows a coalition all so much in lock-step and committed to a single ideology that it is hard to imagine a less truly diverse group.

Joseph Grabowski by Joseph Grabowski
August 20, 2020
in Breaking News, Culture, Opinion
1.3k
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0
A “Big Tent” — Or Merely a Circus?
Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on TelegramShare on TwitterShare on WeChat

I admit I skipped watching the first night of the Democratic National Convention. I did catch up a bit during the day on Tuesday on some of the speeches, like Michelle Obama’s delivered the previous evening. For some thoughts on that, I recommend our own Doug Clark’s reflection here at iFamNews. I’d also commend to your reading Frank Schubert’s excellent piece on the Democratic Party platform, which steers the Party even further Left and into even more radical territory with regard to abortion and progressive sexual ethics than in 2016: something I would have thought nearly impossible.

I did decide to tune in on Tuesday evening to some of the convention, just so that I’d have some idea of what I might expect the media and Twitter to be buzzing about the next day. It was rough going.

One thing jumped out at me from the very beginning of Tuesday night’s proceedings: how thin and odd is the “diversity” of which the American political Left is so proud.

An early opening sequence on Tuesday featured a crowd of mostly young, fresh faces—I suppose the up-and-coming Bright Young Things of Democratic politics. Interspersed as the montage was with grainy, black and white images of their 78-year-old candidate, the choice seemed a bit odd: it seemed to create more contrast with the candidate than it did relatability. The Washington Post called the segment “the most realistic convention speech ever.” But to me, as I watched, a sense of unreality settled upon me.

It was clear to me that despite the ostensible “diversity” of this crowd of young people—varied in race, ethnicity, creed, class, background—they are all united so much in lock-step and committed to a single ideology that it us hard to imagine a less truly diverse group. In one “on the nose” moment, Philadelphia Representative Malcolm Kenyatta appeared alongside another man, the only one of the group that wasn’t alone in the frame. Of course, the reason for this became obvious immediately: the man is his “husband,” and of course his status as a gay man needed to be foregrounded.

That brought to mind another thing everyone on the screen had in common, in spite of their seeming diversity: all of them trade in identity, status, victimization culture, and “intersectionality,” and all the other buzzwords of progressive politics. They all value diversity in a manner of tokenism merely, not real and authentic diversity, the kind that enriches a close-knit community of faith or a neighborhood of immigrants.

If this claim seems too harsh, one need only consider: amidst all their diversity, their proclamations of “tolerance” and “openness” and “welcome,” and their stated goal of building a “big tent” for their Party and “uniting” the nation, most decidedly unwelcome are all of the following, who need not apply for citizenship in these young leaders’ dreamed-of “diverse” Utopia:

  • Anyone who believes that marriage is the union of one man and one woman;
  • Anyone who believes that human life begins in the womb (let alone at conception!) and that it merits legal protection;
  • Anyone who believes that human life is sacred in spite of age or infirmity, and that the state should not allow unscrupulous doctors to show patients to death’s door rather than comfort them in their afflictions;
  • Anyone who believes that sex is biologically determined and binary, and that it cannot be “changed” by manipulative cosmetic surgeries or by chemical mutilations;
  • Anyone who believes that anyone in any of the above categories should be treated with respect and listened to rather than shouted down, bullied, and harried into hiding by a mob of “cancel culture.”

Not really so diverse, after all, it seems.

I’m sure at the Democratic Convention there is diversity enough that all 159 “genders” (or whatever the number has reached as of this writing) are represented; but all of those representatives inevitably think exactly alike, and tolerate no dissent, when it comes to questions of “a woman’s right to choose” or whether religious liberty should take a back seat to special interests of sexual radicals in the public square. It’s a kind of “diversity” for which only one historic precursor comes to mind, and it is not a recommendation: the “diversity” witnessed at the Tower of Babble. Yes, in the new Democratic party, “all are welcome” — provided they swap their own mind for the hive mind on their way in the door, and adopt the confused language of proliferating made-up pronouns and euphemisms about the killing of the innocent.

If the Democratic Party really is trying to court moderate or middle-of-the-road voters, they aren’t making a good show of it. On the contrary, it seems from the outside that their project isn’t really to construct a “big tent” at all, but merely to increase the variety of the circus they’re already hosting, under their increasingly drab and monochrome canopy.

Tags: Democratic ConventionsDemocratic National ConventionDemocratic Party
Joseph Grabowski

Joseph Grabowski

Joseph Grabowski was the Executive Director of the International Organization for the Family until August 2022. He also served as Director of Communications for the National Organization for Marriage. Joseph has a B.A. in Philosophy from Saint Charles Borromeo Seminary, Overbrook and M.A. in English from Marquette University.  Joe has appeared as an expert on traditional marriage and family in local and nationwide media, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Boston Globe, Breitbart, and elsewhere. Joe’s writings on traditional marriage and family, as well as on Catholic Social Teaching and the writings of G. K. Chesterton and Hilaire Belloc, have appeared in The Stream, Gilbert Magazine, Ethika Politika, and The Distributist Review, and he has spoken at several national conferences on the place of G.K. Chesterton in 20th Century literature and thought.

Discussion about this post

Popular News

  • America’s largest Planned Parenthood to close its doors

    America’s largest Planned Parenthood to close its doors

    0 shares 91 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Virginia Gov. Youngkin orders probe into schools arranging abortions

    0 shares 57 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Abortion pill clinic sued by woman whose husband killed her unborn child

    0 shares 52 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Denzel Washington takes a stand against cancel culture: “I follow God”

    0 shares 45 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Scotland drops all charges against grandmother arrested in “buffer zone”

    0 shares 40 VIEWS
    Share 0 Tweet 0

IFN – International Family News Network

© 2022 IFN – International Family News - All Rights Reserved.

Quick Links

  • About iFamNews
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Subscribe

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Opinion
  • Life
  • Family
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Shows
  • Petitions
  • Subscribe
  • Donate

  • en English
  • it Italiano
  • es Español
  • fr Français
  • de Deutsch
  • pl Polski
  • sr српски
  • ru Русский
  • hr Hrvatski
  • Login
  • Sign Up

© 2022 IFN – International Family News - All Rights Reserved.