Men are guilty of being men

To deny science and nature in favor of an ideology is simply to be guilty of "mutilating" children by denying them their very essence.

A heterosexual man is always under suspicion. Everything is questionable and open to criticism.

It is very sad that young boys no longer know anything about the basic rules of politeness and, if they do know them, they do not apply them for fear of being reprimanded. Masculinity is defined as toxic by definition and chivalry seems like a crime.

And yet we need masculinity just as we need femininity.

Masculinity complements femininity. Men and women are equal in rights and dignity but different and complementary, physically and psychically. Young people must know and develop their own qualities in order to find themselves and develop to their full potential. It is unacceptable that complementarity is politically incorrect, and it is unacceptable because we are talking about happiness and fulfillment. To show masculinity as perverse and violent in itself is to condemn boys to develop half-heartedly, to be ashamed of themselves. It is to condemn them to disorientation. And in this path of destruction of masculinity, femininity is also destroyed.

Male and female brains function differently, so it is impossible for them to feel, think and communicate in the same way. To say there are the same is to be in denial and completely aberrant. To deny science and nature in favor of an ideology is simply to be guilty of “mutilating” children by denying them their very essence. We are prisoners of an ideology that has shamelessly imposed itself in the face of widespread passivity, an ideology that has crept into politics and religion.

Benedict XVI spoke of the dictatorship of relativism and that dictatorship is the single thought, the condemnation of dissent, and the generalized embrace of any proposal, no matter how insane it may be.

In this context of denying masculinity, and therefore femininity, men and women are diluted and the first practical–and intended–consequence is that father and mother figures are no longer necessary in the family. The education of children does not benefit from or require a mother and a father because there is no difference between them, the natural family disappears and these “other forms of family” emerge with force.

For that to happen, it was necessary to first get rid of masculinity and femininity by blaming men for being men.

Exit mobile version