{"id":35045,"date":"2020-11-03T02:30:54","date_gmt":"2020-11-03T07:30:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/?p=35045"},"modified":"2020-11-03T02:30:58","modified_gmt":"2020-11-03T07:30:58","slug":"donald-trump-peut-tr-s-bien-tre-r-lu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/donald-trump-peut-tr-s-bien-tre-r-lu","title":{"rendered":"Donald Trump peut tr\u00e8s bien \u00eatre r\u00e9\u00e9lu"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Depuis plusieurs semaines, les m\u00e9dias se sont install\u00e9s sur un sc\u00e9nario selon lequel Joe Biden est le vainqueur assur\u00e9 de l&rsquo;\u00e9lection pr\u00e9sidentielle. Ils pointent, sondage apr\u00e8s sondage, les chiffres qui montrent que Biden est clairement en t\u00eate, en particulier dans les Etats susceptibles de basculer les plus importants. Mais les m\u00e9dias n&rsquo;examinent jamais la base sous-jacente des sondages et prennent ainsi l&rsquo;arbre pour la for\u00eat. Voici ce que je pense que les r\u00e9sultats des \u00e9lections montreront:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Donald Trump peut tr\u00e8s bien \u00eatre r\u00e9\u00e9elu.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comment est-ce possible?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Tout simplement parce que les sondages sont erron\u00e9s<\/em><\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Il y a plusieurs raisons pour lesquelles les sondages sont erron\u00e9s, mais la plus significative est que pratiquement aucun sondage ne fait d&rsquo;ajustement pour le ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne de \u00abbiais de d\u00e9sirabilit\u00e9 sociale\u00bb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>De quoi s&rsquo;agit-il?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Le biais de d\u00e9sirabilit\u00e9 sociale est un ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne relativement r\u00e9cent selon lequel les r\u00e9pondants h\u00e9sitent \u00e0 exprimer \u00e0 un sondeur une opinion qui va \u00e0 l&rsquo;encontre de la culture populaire. Ce n&rsquo;est pas un ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne qui se manifeste \u00e0 chaque campagne \u00e9lectorale. En fait, dans la plupart des cas, ce n&rsquo;est pas du tout un facteur. Cependant, dans les campagnes consid\u00e9r\u00e9es comme particuli\u00e8rement controvers\u00e9es, en particulier celles impliquant des questions ou des candidats particuli\u00e8rement clivants, c&rsquo;est un facteur important.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>J&rsquo;ai une exp\u00e9rience consid\u00e9rable en mati\u00e8re de biais de d\u00e9sirabilit\u00e9 sociale. J&rsquo;ai men\u00e9 avec succ\u00e8s la campagne pour la Proposition 8 en Californie, d\u00e9finissant le mariage exclusivement comme l&rsquo;union d&rsquo;un homme et d&rsquo;une femme. Je ne peux pas imaginer \u00e0 un probl\u00e8me plus clivant que le mariage gay. Pendant la campagne, j&rsquo;ai \u00e9tudi\u00e9 les 26 r\u00e9f\u00e9rendums d&rsquo;\u00c9tat sur le mariage avant la Proposition 8, en comparant les derniers sondages aux votes r\u00e9els. En moyenne, le soutien au mariage traditionnel \u00e9tait sous-repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 de 7% dans les sondages  par rapport au r\u00e9sultat final. Le soutien au mariage traditionnel \u00e9tait sous-estim\u00e9 dans 23 des 26 \u00c9tats \u00e9tudi\u00e9s, allant d&rsquo;un minimum de 3% dans le Kentucky et l&rsquo;Oregon \u00e0 21% dans le Dakota du Nord. Le soutien au mariage traditionnel n&rsquo;a \u00e9t\u00e9 surestim\u00e9 par les sondages que dans un seul \u00c9tat (l&rsquo;Arizona) (de 3%).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>En regardant sp\u00e9cifiquement les trois derniers sondages publics mesurant le vote sur la Prop 8, ils ont montr\u00e9 que la Prop 8 \u00e9tait \u00e0 la tra\u00eene avec, en moyenne, de 45% de Oui contre un peu plus de 50% de Non. Notre dernier sondage interne, le 30 octobre, avait donn\u00e9 pour r\u00e9sultat 44% de Oui, 46% de Non.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Les r\u00e9sultats finaux sur la Prop 8 \u00e9taient un peu plus de 52% de Oui et un peu moins de 48% de Non. Cela signifie que le soutien \u00e0 la Prop 8 \u00e9tait sous-repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 d&rsquo;un peu plus de 7%, tandis que l&rsquo;opposition \u00e9tait surrepr\u00e9sent\u00e9e d&rsquo;environ 2%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Par cons\u00e9quent, la campagne pour la Proposition 8 a connu un biais de 9 points dans les sondages.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Je pense que les sondages \u00e9lectoraux lors de l&rsquo;\u00e9lection pr\u00e9sidentielle de 2020 sont \u00e9galement affect\u00e9s par un biais de d\u00e9sirabilit\u00e9 sociale. Pourquoi est-ce que je le pense? Tout comme avec la Proposition 8, lorsque les partisans du mariage traditionnel ont \u00e9t\u00e9 jet\u00e9s en p\u00e2ture au public, boycott\u00e9s, subi des manifestations et cibl\u00e9s de mille mani\u00e8res \u00e0 des fins de repr\u00e9sailles (certains ont \u00e9t\u00e9 vir\u00e9s de leur travail; d&rsquo;autres ont \u00e9t\u00e9 agress\u00e9s physiquement), les partisans de Trump sont \u00e9galement soumis au m\u00e9pris public et priv\u00e9. Nous voyons cela partout sur les r\u00e9seaux sociaux. Nous le voyons avec les gens qui assistent aux meetings de Trump. Et avec ceux qui affichent des pancartes Trump dans leurs jardins. Certains grands-parents qui soutiennent Trump se sont m\u00eame vu refuser la visite de leurs petits-enfants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Si la d\u00e9sirabilit\u00e9 sociale est r\u00e9elle, et c&rsquo;est le cas, quel en est l&rsquo;impact potentiel sur les sondages? <em>Il est dramatique.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>J&rsquo;ai examin\u00e9 les trois sondages les plus r\u00e9cents publi\u00e9s par Real Clear Politics pour chaque Etat susceptible de basculer. (Dans quelques cas, il n&rsquo;y avait que deux sondages r\u00e9cents \u00e0 examiner.) J&rsquo;ai exclu tout sondage effectu\u00e9 le 15 octobre ou avant parce qu&rsquo;ils ne sont plus d&rsquo;actualit\u00e9. Dans le petit nombre d&rsquo;\u00c9tats o\u00f9 Real Clear Politics n&rsquo;a publi\u00e9 aucun sondage actuel, j&rsquo;ai utilis\u00e9 les sondages les plus r\u00e9cents publi\u00e9s par FiveThirtyEight. J&rsquo;ai \u00e9galement exclu les sondages du groupe Trafalgar parce que ce sondeur est l&rsquo;un des rares \u00e0 tenter de tenir compte de la d\u00e9sirabilit\u00e9 sociale dans ses r\u00e9sultats.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Supposons que le biais de d\u00e9sirabilit\u00e9 soit de 7%, comme ce fut le cas, en moyenne, dans les campagnes pour le mariage traditionnel, et que nous le r\u00e9partissons comme une sous-estimation du soutien de Trump de 5 points et une surestimation du soutien de Biden de 2 points.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/7percent-bias-1024x653.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-34997\" width=\"1033\" height=\"659\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/7percent-bias-1024x653.png 1024w, https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/7percent-bias-768x490.png 768w, https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/7percent-bias-750x479.png 750w, https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/7percent-bias.png 1050w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1033px) 100vw, 1033px\" \/><figcaption>Electoral map showing 7% desirability bias. Created at <em><a href=\"https:\/\/270towin.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">270towin.com<\/a><\/em>.<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Selon ce sc\u00e9nario, Donald Trump remporte au moins 286 d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9s et est r\u00e9\u00e9lu. Deux \u00c9tats &#8211; le Wisconsin et le Michigan &#8211; seraient \u00e0 moins d&rsquo;un point. En tenant compte des pr\u00e9jug\u00e9s, Trump m\u00e8ne de peu au Michigan et suit de pr\u00e8s dans le Wisconsin, de sorte que sa marge dans le coll\u00e8ge \u00e9lectoral grimperait s&rsquo;il l&#8217;emportait dans l&rsquo;un de ces deux \u00c9tats.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pour mesurer l&rsquo;impact du facteur de biais de d\u00e9sirabilit\u00e9 sociale, la Floride passerait de +1 en faveur de Biden \u00e0 +6 en faveur Trump. Le Nevada passe de +3,3 Biden \u00e0 +3,7 Trump. La Pennsylvanie passe de +2,3 Biden \u00e0 +4,7 Trump.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Qu&rsquo;en est-il si le facteur de d\u00e9sirabilit\u00e9 sociale est de 5 points? M\u00eame r\u00e9sultat: Trump remporte la r\u00e9\u00e9lection avec au moins 285 d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9s. Biden reprend \u00e0 la fois le Wisconsin et le Michigan dans ce sc\u00e9nario, et le 2e district du Maine (avec 1 d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9) serait \u00e0 \u00e9galit\u00e9. Gros probl\u00e8me &#8211; Trump gagne toujours.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"653\" src=\"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/5percent-bias-1024x653.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-35005\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/5percent-bias-1024x653.png 1024w, https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/5percent-bias-768x490.png 768w, https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/5percent-bias-750x479.png 750w, https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/5percent-bias.png 1050w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption>Electoral map showing 5% desirability bias. Created at <em><a href=\"https:\/\/270towin.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">270towin.com<\/a><\/em>.<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>M\u00eame si le facteur de biais de d\u00e9sirabilit\u00e9 sociale n&rsquo;est que de 3 points, le pr\u00e9sident Trump serait toujours aux commandes. Il aurait 258 grands \u00e9lecteurs, tandis que Biden en aurait 253. Le Nevada (avec 6 voix), la Pennsylvanie (avec 20 voix) et le 2e district du Nebraska (avec 1 voix) seraient trop proches pour trancher. En tenant compte des pr\u00e9jug\u00e9s, Trump serait en t\u00eate en Pennsylvanie, ce qui le placerait au sommet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"653\" src=\"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/3percent-bias-1024x653.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-35013\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/3percent-bias-1024x653.png 1024w, https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/3percent-bias-768x490.png 768w, https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/3percent-bias-750x479.png 750w, https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/3percent-bias.png 1050w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption>Electoral map showing 3% desirability bias. Created at <em><a href=\"https:\/\/270towin.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">270towin.com<\/a><\/em>.<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00c9videmment, plus le facteur de d\u00e9sirabilit\u00e9 sociale est important, au-dessus de cette barre des 3 points, plus la probabilit\u00e9 que Donald Trump soit r\u00e9\u00e9lu est grande. N&rsquo;oubliez pas que le facteur de biais Prop 8 \u00e9tait de 9 points. \u00c0 l&rsquo;inverse, un biais inf\u00e9rieur \u00e0 3 points favoriserait la victoire de Joe Biden . M\u00eame l&rsquo;un de ses plus fid\u00e8les soutiens, le co-fondateur du Lincoln Project, Steve Schmidt, dit qu&rsquo;il y a un parti pris anti-Trump dans le sondage, qu&rsquo;il estime \u00e0 2 points. Cela ne laisse pas beaucoup de marge au camp de Biden.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Maintenant, un fait qui donne \u00e0 r\u00e9fl\u00e9chir: il restera des dizaines de millions de bulletins de vote non compt\u00e9s apr\u00e8s le jour du scrutin. Cela signifie que le r\u00e9sultat de la course pr\u00e9sidentielle peut ne pas \u00eatre connu pendant des semaines. Ce seront des semaines o\u00f9 les gauchistes radicaux se d\u00e9cha\u00eeneront dans les villes d&rsquo;Am\u00e9rique alors que les votes seront compt\u00e9s, paniquant compl\u00e8tement sur le possibilit\u00e9 &#8211; non, la probabilit\u00e9 &#8211; que Donald Trump les vainque \u00e0 nouveau.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Cette \u00e9lection de 2020 a d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e9t\u00e9 l&rsquo;une des plus tumultueuses de l&rsquo;histoire. Nous ne savions pas que nous avions peut-\u00eatre v\u00e9cu le calme avant la temp\u00eate.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Si le facteur de d\u00e9sirabilit\u00e9 sociale est r\u00e9el, et c&rsquo;est le cas, quel en est l&rsquo;impact potentiel sur les sondages? Il est \u00e9norme!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":35,"featured_media":35023,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"give_campaign_id":0,"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"mc4wp_mailchimp_campaign":[],"jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":{"subtitle":"Si le facteur de d\u00e9sirabilit\u00e9 sociale est r\u00e9el, et c'est le cas, quel en est l'impact potentiel sur les sondages? Il est \u00e9norme!","format":"standard","video":"","gallery":"","source_name":"","source_url":"","via_name":"","via_url":"","override":[{"single_blog_custom":"","sidebar":"","second_sidebar":"","share_position":"","share_float_style":"","post_date_format":"","post_date_format_custom":"","post_reading_time_wpm":"","zoom_button_out_step":"1","zoom_button_in_step":"1","number_popup_post":"1"}],"image_override":[{"single_post_thumbnail_size":"","single_post_gallery_size":""}],"trending_post_position":"","trending_post_label":"","sponsored_post_label":"","sponsored_post_name":"","sponsored_post_url":"","sponsored_post_logo":"","sponsored_post_desc":""},"jnews_primary_category":{"id":""},"jnews_social_meta":{"fb_title":"","fb_description":"","fb_image":"","twitter_title":"","twitter_description":"","twitter_image":""},"jnews_override_counter":{"view_counter_number":"0","share_counter_number":"0","like_counter_number":"0","dislike_counter_number":"0"},"footnotes":""},"categories":[809,813,796,800],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35045","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-foreground-fr","category-breaking-news-fr","category-opinion-fr","category-politique"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v25.9 (Yoast SEO v27.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Donald Trump peut tr\u00e8s bien \u00eatre r\u00e9\u00e9lu - IFN<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/donald-trump-peut-tr-s-bien-tre-r-lu\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Donald Trump peut tr\u00e8s bien \u00eatre r\u00e9\u00e9lu\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Si le facteur de d\u00e9sirabilit\u00e9 sociale est r\u00e9el, et c&#039;est le cas, quel en est l&#039;impact potentiel sur les sondages? Il est \u00e9norme!\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/donald-trump-peut-tr-s-bien-tre-r-lu\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"IFN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iFamNews\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-11-03T07:30:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-11-03T07:30:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/2020-election-graphic.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1668\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Frank Schubert\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@iFamNewsEN\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@iFamNewsEN\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Frank Schubert\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Donald Trump peut tr\u00e8s bien \u00eatre r\u00e9\u00e9lu - IFN","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/donald-trump-peut-tr-s-bien-tre-r-lu","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Donald Trump peut tr\u00e8s bien \u00eatre r\u00e9\u00e9lu","og_description":"Si le facteur de d\u00e9sirabilit\u00e9 sociale est r\u00e9el, et c'est le cas, quel en est l'impact potentiel sur les sondages? Il est \u00e9norme!","og_url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/donald-trump-peut-tr-s-bien-tre-r-lu","og_site_name":"IFN","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iFamNews","article_published_time":"2020-11-03T07:30:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-11-03T07:30:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2500,"height":1668,"url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/2020-election-graphic.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Frank Schubert","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@iFamNewsEN","twitter_site":"@iFamNewsEN","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"Frank Schubert","Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/donald-trump-peut-tr-s-bien-tre-r-lu#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/donald-trump-peut-tr-s-bien-tre-r-lu"},"author":{"name":"Frank Schubert","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/7f059c4599e9d9efee95adbaab98c714"},"headline":"Donald Trump peut tr\u00e8s bien \u00eatre r\u00e9\u00e9lu","datePublished":"2020-11-03T07:30:54+00:00","dateModified":"2020-11-03T07:30:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/donald-trump-peut-tr-s-bien-tre-r-lu"},"wordCount":1335,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/donald-trump-peut-tr-s-bien-tre-r-lu#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/2020-election-graphic.jpg","articleSection":["Foreground","Nouvelles r\u00e9centes","Opinion","Politique"],"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/donald-trump-peut-tr-s-bien-tre-r-lu#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/donald-trump-peut-tr-s-bien-tre-r-lu","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/donald-trump-peut-tr-s-bien-tre-r-lu","name":"Donald Trump peut tr\u00e8s bien \u00eatre r\u00e9\u00e9lu - IFN","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/donald-trump-peut-tr-s-bien-tre-r-lu#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/donald-trump-peut-tr-s-bien-tre-r-lu#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/2020-election-graphic.jpg","datePublished":"2020-11-03T07:30:54+00:00","dateModified":"2020-11-03T07:30:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/donald-trump-peut-tr-s-bien-tre-r-lu#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/donald-trump-peut-tr-s-bien-tre-r-lu"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/donald-trump-peut-tr-s-bien-tre-r-lu#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/2020-election-graphic.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/2020-election-graphic.jpg","width":2500,"height":1668},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/donald-trump-peut-tr-s-bien-tre-r-lu#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/de"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Opinion","item":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/category\/opinion"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Donald Trump peut tr\u00e8s bien \u00eatre r\u00e9\u00e9lu"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/","name":"IFN","description":"International Family News Network","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#organization","name":"iFamNews","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/Share-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/Share-logo.png","width":200,"height":200,"caption":"iFamNews"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iFamNews","https:\/\/x.com\/iFamNewsEN"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/7f059c4599e9d9efee95adbaab98c714","name":"Frank Schubert","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8e0a875546e6ef79d48161a997753eefc2376ae6843657e3a11827a2b2886fd2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8e0a875546e6ef79d48161a997753eefc2376ae6843657e3a11827a2b2886fd2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8e0a875546e6ef79d48161a997753eefc2376ae6843657e3a11827a2b2886fd2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Frank Schubert"},"description":"Frank Schubert is a communications consultant for the International Organization for the Family (IOF) and has twice been named America\u2019s top public affairs professional. Schubert serves a similar role for the National Organization for Marriage (NOM). He has worked extensively on family-related issues including supporting marriage, the sanctity of human life and religious liberty, among other issues. Schubert is one of the country\u2019s top experts in managing ballot initiative campaigns and has won over 50 such campaigns in over one-dozen states, compiling an 80% winning record. He managed the successful Proposition 8 campaign in California as well as subsequent winning campaigns on marriage in Maine and North Carolina. His views on issues have been widely reported by the national and international media and he has been interviewed by news organizations hundreds of times. He is the founder of Inspiration Strategies, a public affairs firm.","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/author\/fschubertifamnews-com"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35045","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/35"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35045"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35045\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35061,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35045\/revisions\/35061"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35023"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35045"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35045"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35045"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}