{"id":78885,"date":"2021-06-20T09:11:19","date_gmt":"2021-06-20T13:11:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/?p=78885"},"modified":"2021-06-20T09:11:21","modified_gmt":"2021-06-20T13:11:21","slug":"el-tribunal-de-justicia-confirma-por-unanimidad-la-libertad-religiosa-de-los-servicios-sociales-cat-licos","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/el-tribunal-de-justicia-confirma-por-unanimidad-la-libertad-religiosa-de-los-servicios-sociales-cat-licos","title":{"rendered":"El Tribunal Supremo de EE.UU. un\u00e1nime con la libertad religiosa de la asistencia social Cat\u00f3lica"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>En una sentencia un\u00e1nime dictada hoy por el Tribunal Supremo de Estados Unidos en el caso <em>Fulton contra Filadelfia<\/em>, el Tribunal sostuvo que la ciudad de Filadelfia violaba la Primera Enmienda por negarse a contratar a los Servicios Sociales Cat\u00f3licos (CSS) para prestar servicios de acogida debido a la falta de voluntad de la agencia para certificar a las parejas del mismo sexo como padres de acogida.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed aligncenter is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\"><p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Unanimous Supreme Court ruling in favor of Catholic Social Services foster care agency! &quot;The refusal of Philadelphia to contract with CSS unless CSS agrees to certify same-sex couples as foster parents violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.&quot;<\/p>&mdash; Ryan T. Anderson (@RyanTAnd) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/RyanTAnd\/status\/1405531705851580420?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 17, 2021<\/a><\/blockquote><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed aligncenter is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\"><p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">SCOTUS unanimously held that religious adoption agencies have a right to *act* according to marriage being the union of one man and one woman, free from facing government discrimination. Question for the LGBT Left: are Kagan, Breyer, Sotomayor to be cancelled as bigots now?<\/p>&mdash; Roger Severino (@RogerSeverino_) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/RogerSeverino_\/status\/1405543838777712645?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 17, 2021<\/a><\/blockquote><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Aunque la sentencia en s\u00ed misma no fue sorprendente para muchos observadores experimentados del Tribunal, el hecho de que se dictara con una votaci\u00f3n de 9-0 fue un poco inesperado. Ed Whalen, en un art\u00edculo en <em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/bench-memos\/a-quick-guide-to-todays-opinions-in-fulton-v-city-of-philadelphia\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">National Review en l\u00ednea<\/a><\/em> se\u00f1ala que, a pesar de la unanimidad de la sentencia, hubo algunas divergencias entre los jueces en cuanto al razonamiento jur\u00eddico:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>La unanimidad en el juicio de fondo es una gran sorpresa. Pero oculta una profunda divisi\u00f3n sobre si el Tribunal deber\u00eda haber utilizado este caso para revisar la sentencia<em> El Departamento de Trabajo v. Smith<\/em>, el controvertido caso de 1990 en el que una mayor\u00eda de cinco jueces, en una opini\u00f3n del juez Scalia, dictamin\u00f3 que las leyes que son neutrales y de aplicaci\u00f3n general no violan la Cl\u00e1usula de Libre Ejercicio aunque supongan una carga para la libertad religiosa.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Por lo tanto, aunque la sentencia en s\u00ed misma es una gran victoria para la libertad religiosa, las divisiones entre el tribunal, incluso en medio del acuerdo, demuestran que algunas de las cuestiones relativas a este caso seguir\u00e1n siendo temas vivos de debate en el futuro, especialmente en lo que respecta a si <em>Smith <\/em>debe mantenerse en \u00faltima instancia como precedente. La sentencia Smith sostuvo que las leyes que son neutrales y de aplicaci\u00f3n general no violan la Cl\u00e1usula de Libre Ejercicio, aunque supongan una carga para la libertad religiosa. Pero parece que hay cierto escepticismo sobre esta doble prueba en el banquillo actual. Como resume sucintamente Whalen \u00abEn general, parecer\u00eda que hay al menos cinco jueces listos para (Thomas, Alito y Gorsuch), o dispuestos a (Barrett y Kavanaugh) revocar a <em>Smith<\/em>. Pero Barrett y Kavanaugh a\u00fan no est\u00e1n seguros de qu\u00e9 normas deben sustituir a <em>Smith<\/em>\u00ab.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Con una administraci\u00f3n en la Casa Blanca decidida a promover una pol\u00edtica antifamiliar y antivida en todo momento, podemos estar seguros de que la cuesti\u00f3n de la libertad religiosa en estos contextos volver\u00e1 a surgir; y por ello, a los observadores del Tribunal les interesar\u00e1 ahora estar atentos a c\u00f3mo <em>Smith <\/em>es tratado en los tribunales en instancias inferiores, para ver si el Tribunal Supremo podr\u00e1 eludir la cuesti\u00f3n definitiva de su destino en el futuro.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Aunque la sentencia en s\u00ed misma no fue sorprendente para muchos observadores experimentados del Tribunal, el hecho de que se dictara con una votaci\u00f3n de 9-0 fue un poco inesperado.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":78566,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"give_campaign_id":0,"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"mc4wp_mailchimp_campaign":[],"jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":{"subtitle":"Aunque la sentencia en s\u00ed misma no fue sorprendente para muchos observadores experimentados del Tribunal, el hecho de que se dictara con una votaci\u00f3n de 9-0 no fue lo que se preve\u00eda.","format":"standard","video":"","gallery":"","source_name":"","source_url":"","via_name":"","via_url":"","override":[{"single_blog_custom":"","sidebar":"","second_sidebar":"","share_position":"","share_float_style":"","post_date_format":"","post_date_format_custom":"","post_reading_time_wpm":"","zoom_button_out_step":"1","zoom_button_in_step":"1","number_popup_post":"1"}],"image_override":[{"single_post_thumbnail_size":"","single_post_gallery_size":""}],"trending_post_position":"","trending_post_label":"","sponsored_post_label":"","sponsored_post_name":"","sponsored_post_url":"","sponsored_post_logo":"","sponsored_post_desc":""},"jnews_primary_category":{"id":""},"jnews_social_meta":[],"jnews_override_counter":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[775,810,815],"tags":[11154,11156,11157,11153,11158],"class_list":["post-78885","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-familia","category-foreground-es","category-breaking-news-es","tag-libertad-religiosa-es-2","tag-libertad-religiosa-es-3","tag-primera-enmienda","tag-tribunal-supremo","tag-tribunal-supremo-de-ee-uu"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v25.9 (Yoast SEO v27.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>El Tribunal Supremo de EE.UU. un\u00e1nime con la libertad religiosa de la asistencia social Cat\u00f3lica - IFN<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/el-tribunal-de-justicia-confirma-por-unanimidad-la-libertad-religiosa-de-los-servicios-sociales-cat-licos\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"El Tribunal Supremo de EE.UU. un\u00e1nime con la libertad religiosa de la asistencia social Cat\u00f3lica\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Aunque la sentencia en s\u00ed misma no fue sorprendente para muchos observadores experimentados del Tribunal, el hecho de que se dictara con una votaci\u00f3n de 9-0 fue un poco inesperado.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/el-tribunal-de-justicia-confirma-por-unanimidad-la-libertad-religiosa-de-los-servicios-sociales-cat-licos\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"IFN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iFamNews\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/fb.com\/JoeyG2001\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-06-20T13:11:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-06-20T13:11:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/scotus-2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Joseph Grabowski\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/ArthurInglewood\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@iFamNewsEN\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Joseph Grabowski\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tiempo de lectura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutos\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"El Tribunal Supremo de EE.UU. un\u00e1nime con la libertad religiosa de la asistencia social Cat\u00f3lica - IFN","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/el-tribunal-de-justicia-confirma-por-unanimidad-la-libertad-religiosa-de-los-servicios-sociales-cat-licos","og_locale":"es_ES","og_type":"article","og_title":"El Tribunal Supremo de EE.UU. un\u00e1nime con la libertad religiosa de la asistencia social Cat\u00f3lica","og_description":"Aunque la sentencia en s\u00ed misma no fue sorprendente para muchos observadores experimentados del Tribunal, el hecho de que se dictara con una votaci\u00f3n de 9-0 fue un poco inesperado.","og_url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/el-tribunal-de-justicia-confirma-por-unanimidad-la-libertad-religiosa-de-los-servicios-sociales-cat-licos","og_site_name":"IFN","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iFamNews","article_author":"https:\/\/fb.com\/JoeyG2001","article_published_time":"2021-06-20T13:11:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-06-20T13:11:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/scotus-2.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Joseph Grabowski","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/ArthurInglewood","twitter_site":"@iFamNewsEN","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"Joseph Grabowski","Tiempo de lectura":"2 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/el-tribunal-de-justicia-confirma-por-unanimidad-la-libertad-religiosa-de-los-servicios-sociales-cat-licos#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/el-tribunal-de-justicia-confirma-por-unanimidad-la-libertad-religiosa-de-los-servicios-sociales-cat-licos"},"author":{"name":"Joseph Grabowski","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/30305f5661b96ab7ae4c4cabd3631ed4"},"headline":"El Tribunal Supremo de EE.UU. un\u00e1nime con la libertad religiosa de la asistencia social Cat\u00f3lica","datePublished":"2021-06-20T13:11:19+00:00","dateModified":"2021-06-20T13:11:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/el-tribunal-de-justicia-confirma-por-unanimidad-la-libertad-religiosa-de-los-servicios-sociales-cat-licos"},"wordCount":482,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/el-tribunal-de-justicia-confirma-por-unanimidad-la-libertad-religiosa-de-los-servicios-sociales-cat-licos#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/scotus-2.jpg","keywords":["Libertad religiosa","Libertad religiosa","primera enmienda","Tribunal Supremo","Tribunal Supremo de EE.UU."],"articleSection":["Familia","Foreground","\u00daLTIMAS NOTICIAS"],"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/el-tribunal-de-justicia-confirma-por-unanimidad-la-libertad-religiosa-de-los-servicios-sociales-cat-licos#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/el-tribunal-de-justicia-confirma-por-unanimidad-la-libertad-religiosa-de-los-servicios-sociales-cat-licos","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/el-tribunal-de-justicia-confirma-por-unanimidad-la-libertad-religiosa-de-los-servicios-sociales-cat-licos","name":"El Tribunal Supremo de EE.UU. un\u00e1nime con la libertad religiosa de la asistencia social Cat\u00f3lica - IFN","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/el-tribunal-de-justicia-confirma-por-unanimidad-la-libertad-religiosa-de-los-servicios-sociales-cat-licos#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/el-tribunal-de-justicia-confirma-por-unanimidad-la-libertad-religiosa-de-los-servicios-sociales-cat-licos#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/scotus-2.jpg","datePublished":"2021-06-20T13:11:19+00:00","dateModified":"2021-06-20T13:11:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/el-tribunal-de-justicia-confirma-por-unanimidad-la-libertad-religiosa-de-los-servicios-sociales-cat-licos#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/el-tribunal-de-justicia-confirma-por-unanimidad-la-libertad-religiosa-de-los-servicios-sociales-cat-licos"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/el-tribunal-de-justicia-confirma-por-unanimidad-la-libertad-religiosa-de-los-servicios-sociales-cat-licos#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/scotus-2.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/scotus-2.jpg","width":1200,"height":675},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/el-tribunal-de-justicia-confirma-por-unanimidad-la-libertad-religiosa-de-los-servicios-sociales-cat-licos#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/de"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Breaking News","item":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/category\/breaking-news"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"El Tribunal Supremo de EE.UU. un\u00e1nime con la libertad religiosa de la asistencia social Cat\u00f3lica"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/","name":"IFN","description":"International Family News Network","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#organization","name":"iFamNews","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/Share-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/Share-logo.png","width":200,"height":200,"caption":"iFamNews"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iFamNews","https:\/\/x.com\/iFamNewsEN"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/30305f5661b96ab7ae4c4cabd3631ed4","name":"Joseph Grabowski","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/da56cd73ef38f2251d2a2f26456356b62cf59dd9ce3c93148cd2267f6819255e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/da56cd73ef38f2251d2a2f26456356b62cf59dd9ce3c93148cd2267f6819255e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/da56cd73ef38f2251d2a2f26456356b62cf59dd9ce3c93148cd2267f6819255e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Joseph Grabowski"},"description":"Joseph Grabowski was the Executive Director of the International Organization for the Family until August 2022. He also served as Director of Communications for the National Organization for Marriage. Joseph has a B.A. in Philosophy from Saint Charles Borromeo Seminary, Overbrook and M.A. in English from Marquette University.\u00a0 Joe has appeared as an expert on traditional marriage and family in local and nationwide media, including\u00a0The New York Times,\u00a0The Washington Post,\u00a0The Boston Globe,\u00a0Breitbart, and elsewhere. Joe\u2019s writings on traditional marriage and family, as well as on Catholic Social Teaching and the writings of G. K. Chesterton and Hilaire Belloc, have appeared in\u00a0The Stream,\u00a0Gilbert\u00a0Magazine,\u00a0Ethika Politika, and\u00a0The Distributist Review, and he has spoken at several national conferences on the place of G.K. Chesterton in 20th Century literature and thought.","sameAs":["https:\/\/joegrabowski.com","https:\/\/fb.com\/JoeyG2001","https:\/\/linkedin.com\/in\/josephlgrabowski\/","https:\/\/x.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/ArthurInglewood"],"url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/author\/jgrabowski"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78885","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=78885"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78885\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":78894,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78885\/revisions\/78894"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/78566"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=78885"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=78885"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=78885"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}