{"id":92225,"date":"2021-09-08T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-09-08T12:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/?p=92225"},"modified":"2021-09-21T13:26:10","modified_gmt":"2021-09-21T17:26:10","slug":"the-mother-of-all-rulings-the-coming-end-of-roe-v-wade-part-three","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/the-mother-of-all-rulings-the-coming-end-of-roe-v-wade-part-three","title":{"rendered":"The mother of all rulings: the coming end of Roe v Wade &#8211; part three"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"last-updated\">Last updated on September 21st, 2021 at 01:26 pm<\/p>\n<p>The <em>Dobbs v Jackson Women\u2019s Health Organization <\/em>case now pending before the US Supreme Court is likely to be the most watched and consequential legal case of the past fifty years. Depending on the outcome, it has the potential to be a defining case for generations and will become a dominant point of discussion next year and for years to come. In Part One of this article, I discussed the Court\u2019s catastrophic abortion jurisprudence and reviewed the full-on frontal challenge that the <em>Dobbs<\/em> case presents to the notion that the US Constitution contains a right to abortion. In Part Two, I briefly examined the legal doctrine of <em>stare decisis<\/em> and began to explore how politics could heavily influence whether a majority of justices allow it to save the illegitimate <em>Roe<\/em> and <em>Casey<\/em> decisions. Today in the final installment of this article, I dive headlong into a detailed discussion of what the real-world politics of this case will likely look like.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Supreme Court has set the <em>Dobbs<\/em> case on an ordinary legal path leading to briefing, argument and decision, but that path will likely include some extraordinary developments. How will politics impact the process of deciding this case? I envision:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>Immediately after the opposition briefs are submitted next week there will begin an ongoing focus of the liberal legacy media talking about the \u201cgrave harm\u201d that would befall women and girls \u2013 especially the poor, the young and those of color \u2013 should the Court rule in favor of Mississippi. Indeed, the words of the uber-liberal Obama-appointed trial court judge who blocked the Gestational Age Act from taking effect will enjoy much prominence in the media\u2019s framing of the case. Judge Carlton Reeves called the law \u201cgaslighting\u201d and a remnant of \u201cthe old Mississippi \u2013 the Mississippi bent on controlling women and minorities.\u201d This sort of invective \u2013 apparently opposing abortion is racist \u2013 will ramp up as oral argument approaches next year and will reach a fever pitch thereafter.<\/li><li>This messaging will be repeated ad nauseum in advertisements designed to strike fear in the minds of both Supreme Court justices and the Democrat base. Tens of millions of dollars will be spent in the Washington, DC media market alone. Millions more will be spent on liberal cable outlets such as CNN and MSNCB. They will be complimented by massive spending on online digital ads and social media aimed at young Democrats, especially young women, across the country. This will build to the point of oral argument, and then ramp up further from there.<\/li><li>When a date for oral argument is announced, there will begin a continual presence at the Supreme Court by leftist activists and protestors to ensure that no justice, court employee, litigant, media representative or observer escapes what is being demanded of the justices.<\/li><li>Sometime near or during the day of oral argument there will be a massive \u2013 <em>massive<\/em> \u2013 display of protestors in Washington, DC. I would not be surprised to see hundreds of thousands (or even more) liberal activists descend on Washington to demand that <em>Roe<\/em> and <em>Casey<\/em> be preserved. They will be angry, agitated and insistent. It\u2019s also very likely that a huge throng of pro-life advocates will come to Washington to protest abortion and demand that <em>Roe<\/em> and <em>Casey<\/em> be overturned. The potential for physical confrontation certainly exists and if that does occur, the pro-life community will be blamed by the mainstream media.<\/li><li>Powerful Democrat politicians (Schumer, Pelosi, White House officials and Joe Biden himself) will not be shy in making it clear that if the Supreme Court overturns <em>Roe<\/em> and <em>Casey<\/em>, then it will become an illegitimate institution and Congress will respond by packing the Supreme Court. Supreme Court packing was the first reaction when a majority of justices \u2013 in an entirely procedural ruling \u2013 allowed the Texas fetal heartbeat bill to go into effect. Any Democrat such as Joe Manchin or Krysten Sinema who refuses to go along with cracking the filibuster enough to pack the Court will face the same type of pressure as the Supreme Court justices will face.<\/li><li>There also will be attempts to enact abortion as a federal right by statute. This, too, was promised by Nancy Pelosi in the wake of the Texas abortion case procedural ruling. A huge battle will occur in Congress. Pro-abortion Republicans will get plenty of air time on CNN and MSNBC to pressure their colleagues. Pushing legislation will serve as a tool to keep the left\u2019s messaging front and center nationally and in the states. And if the Supreme Court does eventually rule to overturn <em>Roe<\/em> and <em>Casey<\/em>, this legislation will become the \u201cprize\u201d that liberals hope to secure in the 2022 midterm elections.&nbsp;<\/li><li>Once oral argument occurs, there will be special pressure leveled on swing justices who are thought to be leaning to overturn the existing constitutional \u201cright\u201d to abortion. Recall the words of radical Rep. Maxine Waters who told leftists to not give any Trump administration official a moment\u2019s peace. Politicians like Josh Hawley, Rand Paul and Lindsey Graham have all been targeted by the left at home and while out with friends and family. Supreme Court justices \u2013 as well as members of their families \u2013 can expect to be similarly targeted as well.<\/li><li>The establishment, led by Big Tech and large corporations generally thought to be \u201cconservative,\u201d will weigh in for abortion, warning that a repeal of <em>Roe<\/em> and <em>Casey<\/em> will destabilize democracy.<\/li><li>Virtually every professional association in the medical field will demand that the right to abortion be upheld nationwide \u201cor people will die.\u201d The same is true of the American Bar Association and most other elements of the legal profession.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>The pressure campaign from the left will not go uncontested from the right, especially from pro-life activists. They will raise money, run ads, work social media, organize rallies and mount protests, realizing that the <em>Dobbs <\/em>case is the mother of all abortion cases. Unfortunately, they won\u2019t enjoy anywhere near the same sort of media cover that the pro-abortion side will enjoy. That\u2019s because many in the conservative media, especially Fox News Channel, are reluctant to champion social conservativism. To a lesser degree, the same can be said of many right-leaning digital media. General silence from FNC may prove an opening for other cable outlets on the right, like Newsmax and One America News Network. And pro-lifers will grow increasingly agitated at center-right news sites if they ignore the critical importance of the <em>Dobbs <\/em>case. Thus, reportage on the <em>Dobbs<\/em> case could play a role in a potential remaking of the center-right media landscape.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In short, the pressure on justices from both sides (but especially from the left) during the run-up to a decision in the <em>Dobbs<\/em> case will be unlike anything any justice has ever experienced in the history of our nation. It only takes two of the six \u201cpro-life\u201d justices to buckle. But will they?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Professor Michael Stokes Paulsen calls Chief Justice Roberts a \u201ccautious institutionalist\u201d who values stability, reliance and humility but at the same time believes that stare decisis serves institutional values only when it first serves the Constitution. He may be right in theory, but I don\u2019t think he will be right in practice. In my view, Chief Justice John Roberts is virtually certain to succumb to the pressure he will face. His decision in the Obamacare case is a clear indication of his inability to handle intense pressure. Roberts was strongly believed to be in favor of rejecting Obamacare but reportedly changed his mind at the very last moment. His decision upholding Obamacare actually reads as if it was originally written to overturn it, and then poorly refashioned at the last minute. He also appears to have buckled to pressure from Senate Democrats not to take up an important gun rights case under threat that Congress would restructure the Court if it did. The Court did what the Democrats demanded. When Senate Leader Chuck Schumer publicly warned Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh not to uphold a Louisiana abortion law or risk \u201cunleashing a whirlwind\u201d such that \u201cyou won\u2019t know what hit you,\u201d Roberts issued a public rebuke of Schumer. That is well and good, but ultimately, he joined with the Court\u2019s liberals to invalidate the Louisiana law in a 5-4 decision. Finally, and perhaps most significantly, Roberts joined with the Court\u2019s liberals last week seeking to prevent the Texas fetal heartbeat bill from taking effect. Distinguished legal analyst Ed Whelan called Roberts\u2019 position in the Texas fetal heartbeat case \u201cmost disappointing \u2014 because we should have expected so much better, especially from someone who often presents himself as very serious about jurisdictional limits on judicial power.\u201d In a series of previous posts, Whelan had laid out in detail why Roberts\u2019 jurisprudence on stare decisis should lead him to overturn <em>Roe <\/em>and <em>Casey<\/em>. Alas, Roberts\u2019 betrayal of Whelan\u2019s confidence in the Texas case makes it clear what he will do in <em>Dobbs<\/em>. In my view, Roberts\u2019 vote is already lost; John Roberts is today\u2019s David Souter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In his ranking of the justices on their views regarding stare decisis, Professor Paulsen lists Clarence Thomas as the purest justice when it comes to refusing to give effect to demonstrably erroneous constitutional precedent. A close second is Justice Samuel Alito. Interestingly, both Thomas and Alito have all but invited a challenge to another illegitimate Supreme Court ruling, the 5-4 gay marriage decision in <em>Obergefell<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Professor Paulsen believes that Justice Neil Gorsuch, like Thomas and Alito, is solidly of the view that <em>Roe<\/em> and <em>Casey<\/em> were wrongly decided. Further, \u201cGorsuch would never hide behind stare decisis to reach a result he thought badly wrong on the merits.\u201d Let us hope that Professor Paulsen\u2019s intuition is correct. Many social conservatives have grown quite wary of Gorsuch owing to his disastrous majority opinion in <em>Bostock v Clayton County<\/em>. In <em>Bostock<\/em>, Gorsuch ruled that <em>in 1964<\/em> when Congress enacted Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, it banned employment discrimination against transgender individuals. We can only hope that Gorsuch does not invent some new rabbit hole in which he sees hiding a heretofore unknown reason to preserve <em>Roe<\/em> and <em>Casey.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And what of Justice Brett Kavanaugh? Paulsen describes Kavanaugh\u2019s views on stare decisis as \u201csubtle and sophisticated\u201d yet he says Kavanaugh believes stare decisis can \u201cnever entrench precedents that are \u2018grievously or egregiously wrong\u2019.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>With Kavanaugh, the anticipated pressure campaign could very well backfire. He was subjected to arguably one of the most brutally unfair Senate confirmation processes in history, worse even than what Justice Clarence Thomas endured, as well as the rejected Robert Bork. Further attacks on him or his family could well serve to buttress his already considerable concerns with stare decisis, cementing in him a view to overturn <em>Roe<\/em> and <em>Casey<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>That brings us to Justice Amy Coney Barrett. Professor Paulsen highly regards her substantial scholarship on the issue of stare decisis, written as a distinguished constitutional law professor and concludes, \u201cIt is simply unfathomable that Barrett would reaffirm&nbsp;<em>Roe&nbsp;<\/em>on the basis of stare decisis.\u201d Certainly there are millions of Americans, especially social conservatives and people of faith, who have that very same expectation. They fought hard to help secure her confirmation to the Court in the belief that this pro-life mother would fight for life on the Court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Barrett and Kavanaugh make five\u2026finally, mercifully, ending <em>Roe<\/em> and <em>Casey<\/em>. Of significant note, these are the same five justices who comprised the majority allowing the Texas law to go into effect. If one of these five caves to pressure, however, <em>Roe<\/em> and <em>Casey<\/em> will endure and <em>Dobbs<\/em> will go to the front of a select list of infamous, illegitimate and anti-constitutional decisions issued by the Court such as <em>Dred Scott v Sandford<\/em>, <em>Buck v Bell<\/em>, <em>Obergefell v Hodges<\/em> and the aforementioned <em>Roe<\/em> and <em>Casey<\/em> rulings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Depending on the outcome, the <em>Dobbs<\/em> case could have a monumental impact on public policy and the body politic for many years to come. If a majority on the Court votes to overturn <em>Roe<\/em> and <em>Casey<\/em> and return the abortion issue to where it belongs \u2013 in the hands of state legislatures and voters \u2013 conservatives will cheer the outcome and work their tails off to protect the victory in the 2022 elections by putting Republicans in charge of Congress and state legislatures. Abortion will become a dominant issue in campaigns across the country. Liberals will be apoplectic and do everything in their power to secure enhanced political power for themselves and their Democrat allies during those same elections.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, if a majority of the Court leaves a federal constitutional right to abortion intact, I believe something very different will be the result, a result that will threaten the continued viability of the Republican party.&nbsp; Liberals will temporarily celebrate the ruling but soon will return to attacking Republicans and \u201cRepublican judges\u201d as wanting to make abortion illegal. Their tune never changes.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Many conservatives, however, will likely have had enough. Enough of supporting Republican candidates who, once elected, do close to nothing to actually fight for conservative policies and principles. And enough of fighting to confirm federal court justices appointed by Republican presidents who end up caving when it matters most. Millions will be forced to confront the question, \u201cwhat is the point?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I hope that national Republican leaders from Sen. Mitch McConnell and Rep. Kevin McCarthy on down realize what is at stake for their party. Right now, there is little indication that they do. They should be pointing to <em>Dobbs<\/em> as an opportunity for the Court to correct a historic injustice that has sacrificed the lives of millions of innocents. Instead, they are silent, ceding the public square to Nancy Pelosi and Planned Parenthood who are busy trying to shape a national narrative in this vacuum of GOP leadership.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Let us hope and pray that the Court\u2019s conservatives do what the Constitution requires and what moral clarity demands \u2013 end the illegitimate, unconscionable abortion regime imposed on the country nearly fifty years ago in <em>Roe v Wade <\/em>and later refashioned and reaffirmed in <em>Casey<\/em>. Nay, conservatives must do more than hope and pray. We must <em>demand<\/em> that the justices hold firm to the Constitution; we must support those courageous pro-life backers and nonprofit groups who are on the field of battle as the <em>Dobbs<\/em> case proceeds; we must insist that Republican leaders speak out forcefully and clearly for overturning <em>Roe<\/em> and <em>Casey<\/em>, and we must remember, always, the sixty million innocent souls who are watching from above to see if we \u2013 and the conservative justices of the Supreme Court \u2013 have the courage of our convictions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Dobbs<\/em> will be a case like no other.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last updated on September 21st, 2021 at 01:26 pm The Dobbs v Jackson Women\u2019s Health Organization case now pending before the US Supreme Court is likely to be the most watched and consequential legal case of the past fifty years. Depending on the outcome, it has the potential to be a defining case for generations [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":35,"featured_media":92256,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"give_campaign_id":0,"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"mc4wp_mailchimp_campaign":[],"jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":{"subtitle":"The Supreme Court has set the Dobbs case is on an ordinary legal path leading to briefing, argument and decision, but that path will likely include some extraordinary developments.","format":"standard","video":"","gallery":"","source_name":"","source_url":"","via_name":"","via_url":"","override":[{"template":"1","single_blog_custom":"","parallax":"1","fullscreen":"1","layout":"right-sidebar","sidebar":"","second_sidebar":"","sticky_sidebar":"1","share_position":"","share_float_style":"","show_share_counter":"1","show_view_counter":"1","show_featured":"1","show_post_meta":"1","show_post_author":"1","show_post_author_image":"1","show_post_date":"1","post_date_format":"","post_date_format_custom":"","show_post_category":"1","post_reading_time_wpm":"","zoom_button_out_step":"1","zoom_button_in_step":"1","show_post_tag":"1","show_prev_next_post":"1","show_popup_post":"1","number_popup_post":"1"}],"image_override":[{"single_post_thumbnail_size":"","single_post_gallery_size":""}],"trending_post_position":"","trending_post_label":"","sponsored_post_label":"","sponsored_post_name":"","sponsored_post_url":"","sponsored_post_logo":"","sponsored_post_desc":""},"jnews_primary_category":{"id":"808"},"jnews_social_meta":[],"jnews_override_counter":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[804,805,808],"tags":[475,5858,12270,5949,12268,12272,12271,12269,12273,6301,7871,5950,9622],"class_list":["post-92225","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-breaking-news","category-foreground","category-life","tag-abortion","tag-amy-coney-barrett-2","tag-brett-kavanaugh","tag-clarence-thomas","tag-john-roberts","tag-kevin-mccarthy","tag-mitch-mcconnell","tag-neil-gorsuch","tag-republican-party","tag-roe","tag-roe-v-wade-2","tag-samuel-alito","tag-us-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v25.9 (Yoast SEO v27.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The mother of all rulings: the coming end of Roe v Wade - part three - IFN<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/the-mother-of-all-rulings-the-coming-end-of-roe-v-wade-part-three\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The mother of all rulings: the coming end of Roe v Wade - part three\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Last updated on September 21st, 2021 at 01:26 pm The Dobbs v Jackson Women\u2019s Health Organization case now pending before the US Supreme Court is likely to be the most watched and consequential legal case of the past fifty years. Depending on the outcome, it has the potential to be a defining case for generations [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/the-mother-of-all-rulings-the-coming-end-of-roe-v-wade-part-three\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"IFN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iFamNews\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-09-08T12:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-09-21T17:26:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/2021_Roberts_Court_Formal_131209_Web2-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Frank Schubert\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@iFamNewsEN\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@iFamNewsEN\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Frank Schubert\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The mother of all rulings: the coming end of Roe v Wade - part three - IFN","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/the-mother-of-all-rulings-the-coming-end-of-roe-v-wade-part-three","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The mother of all rulings: the coming end of Roe v Wade - part three","og_description":"Last updated on September 21st, 2021 at 01:26 pm The Dobbs v Jackson Women\u2019s Health Organization case now pending before the US Supreme Court is likely to be the most watched and consequential legal case of the past fifty years. Depending on the outcome, it has the potential to be a defining case for generations [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/the-mother-of-all-rulings-the-coming-end-of-roe-v-wade-part-three","og_site_name":"IFN","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iFamNews","article_published_time":"2021-09-08T12:00:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-09-21T17:26:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/2021_Roberts_Court_Formal_131209_Web2-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Frank Schubert","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@iFamNewsEN","twitter_site":"@iFamNewsEN","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Frank Schubert","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/the-mother-of-all-rulings-the-coming-end-of-roe-v-wade-part-three#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/the-mother-of-all-rulings-the-coming-end-of-roe-v-wade-part-three"},"author":{"name":"Frank Schubert","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/7f059c4599e9d9efee95adbaab98c714"},"headline":"The mother of all rulings: the coming end of Roe v Wade &#8211; part three","datePublished":"2021-09-08T12:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2021-09-21T17:26:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/the-mother-of-all-rulings-the-coming-end-of-roe-v-wade-part-three"},"wordCount":2468,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/the-mother-of-all-rulings-the-coming-end-of-roe-v-wade-part-three#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/2021_Roberts_Court_Formal_131209_Web2-1.jpg","keywords":["Abortion","Amy Coney Barrett","Brett Kavanaugh","Clarence Thomas","John Roberts","Kevin McCarthy","Mitch McConnell","Neil Gorsuch","Republican Party","Roe","Roe v. Wade","Samuel Alito","US Supreme Court"],"articleSection":["Breaking News","Foreground","Life"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/the-mother-of-all-rulings-the-coming-end-of-roe-v-wade-part-three#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/the-mother-of-all-rulings-the-coming-end-of-roe-v-wade-part-three","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/the-mother-of-all-rulings-the-coming-end-of-roe-v-wade-part-three","name":"The mother of all rulings: the coming end of Roe v Wade - part three - IFN","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/the-mother-of-all-rulings-the-coming-end-of-roe-v-wade-part-three#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/the-mother-of-all-rulings-the-coming-end-of-roe-v-wade-part-three#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/2021_Roberts_Court_Formal_131209_Web2-1.jpg","datePublished":"2021-09-08T12:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2021-09-21T17:26:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/the-mother-of-all-rulings-the-coming-end-of-roe-v-wade-part-three#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/the-mother-of-all-rulings-the-coming-end-of-roe-v-wade-part-three"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/the-mother-of-all-rulings-the-coming-end-of-roe-v-wade-part-three#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/2021_Roberts_Court_Formal_131209_Web2-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/2021_Roberts_Court_Formal_131209_Web2-1.jpg","width":1200,"height":675},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/the-mother-of-all-rulings-the-coming-end-of-roe-v-wade-part-three#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u0413\u043b\u0430\u0432\u043d\u0430 \u0432\u0435\u0441\u0442","item":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/sr\/kategorija\/glavna-vest"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"The mother of all rulings: the coming end of Roe v Wade &#8211; part three"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/","name":"IFN","description":"International Family News Network","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#organization","name":"iFamNews","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/Share-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/Share-logo.png","width":200,"height":200,"caption":"iFamNews"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iFamNews","https:\/\/x.com\/iFamNewsEN"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/7f059c4599e9d9efee95adbaab98c714","name":"Frank Schubert","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8e0a875546e6ef79d48161a997753eefc2376ae6843657e3a11827a2b2886fd2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8e0a875546e6ef79d48161a997753eefc2376ae6843657e3a11827a2b2886fd2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8e0a875546e6ef79d48161a997753eefc2376ae6843657e3a11827a2b2886fd2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Frank Schubert"},"description":"Frank Schubert is a communications consultant for the International Organization for the Family (IOF) and has twice been named America\u2019s top public affairs professional. Schubert serves a similar role for the National Organization for Marriage (NOM). He has worked extensively on family-related issues including supporting marriage, the sanctity of human life and religious liberty, among other issues. Schubert is one of the country\u2019s top experts in managing ballot initiative campaigns and has won over 50 such campaigns in over one-dozen states, compiling an 80% winning record. He managed the successful Proposition 8 campaign in California as well as subsequent winning campaigns on marriage in Maine and North Carolina. His views on issues have been widely reported by the national and international media and he has been interviewed by news organizations hundreds of times. He is the founder of Inspiration Strategies, a public affairs firm.","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/author\/fschubertifamnews-com"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92225","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/35"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=92225"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92225\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":95798,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92225\/revisions\/95798"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/92256"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=92225"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=92225"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=92225"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}