{"id":78546,"date":"2021-06-17T12:59:01","date_gmt":"2021-06-17T16:59:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/?p=78546"},"modified":"2021-06-17T13:29:43","modified_gmt":"2021-06-17T17:29:43","slug":"scotus-unanimously-upholds-religious-freedom-for-catholic-social-services","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/scotus-unanimously-upholds-religious-freedom-for-catholic-social-services","title":{"rendered":"SCOTUS unanimously upholds religious freedom for Catholic Social Services"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>In a unanimous ruling by the US Supreme Court today in the case of <em>Fulton v. Philadelphia<\/em>, the Court held that the City of Philadelphia violated the First Amendment for refusal to contract with Catholic Social Services (CSS) to provide foster care services because of the agency&#8217;s unwillingness to certify same-sex couples as foster parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed aligncenter is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\"><p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Unanimous Supreme Court ruling in favor of Catholic Social Services foster care agency! &quot;The refusal of Philadelphia to contract with CSS unless CSS agrees to certify same-sex couples as foster parents violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.&quot;<\/p>&mdash; Ryan T. Anderson (@RyanTAnd) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/RyanTAnd\/status\/1405531705851580420?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 17, 2021<\/a><\/blockquote><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed aligncenter is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\"><p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">SCOTUS unanimously held that religious adoption agencies have a right to *act* according to marriage being the union of one man and one woman, free from facing government discrimination. Question for the LGBT Left: are Kagan, Breyer, Sotomayor to be cancelled as bigots now?<\/p>&mdash; Roger Severino (@RogerSeverino_) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/RogerSeverino_\/status\/1405543838777712645?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 17, 2021<\/a><\/blockquote><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Though the ruling in itself was not surprising to many seasoned Court watchers, the fact that it was handed down with a vote of 9-0 was a bit unexpected. Ed Whalen, writing at <em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/bench-memos\/a-quick-guide-to-todays-opinions-in-fulton-v-city-of-philadelphia\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">National Review Online<\/a><\/em>, points out that, in spite of the unanimity of the holding itself, there were some divergences amongst the Justices as to the legal reasoning involved:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>The unanimity on the bottom-line judgment is a big surprise. But it masks a deep divide over whether the Court should have used this case to revisit&nbsp;<em>Employment Division v. Smith<\/em>, the controversial 1990 case in which a five-justice majority, in an opinion by Justice Scalia, ruled that laws that are neutral and generally applicable do not violate the Free Exercise Clause even if they burden religious liberty.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Thus, while the ruling itself is a great victory for religious liberty, the divisions among the court even amidst agreement demonstrate that some of the issues pertaining to this case will remain live items for debate moving forward, especially regarding whether <em>Smith <\/em>should ultimately be retained as precedent. The Smith ruling held that laws that are neutral and generally applicable do not violate the Free Exercise Clause even if they burden religious liberty. But there seems to be some skepticism about this dual-pronged test on the current bench. As Whalen succinctly summarizes: &#8220;Overall, there would appear to be at least five justices ready (Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch) or disposed (Barrett and Kavanaugh) to overturn <em>Smith<\/em>. But Barrett and Kavanaugh are not yet confident what rules should replace <em>Smith<\/em>.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>With an administration in the White House determined to advance an anti-family and anti-life at every turn, we can be sure that the question of religious freedom in such contexts will be coming up again; and so it will now be in the interest of Court watchers to keep an eye on how <em>Smith <\/em>is treated in the lower courts, to see whether the Supreme Court will be able to evade the ultimate question of its fate in the future.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Though the ruling in itself was not surprising to many seasoned Court watchers, the fact that it was handed down with a vote of 9-0 was a bit unexpected.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":78559,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"give_campaign_id":0,"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"mc4wp_mailchimp_campaign":[],"jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":{"subtitle":"Though the ruling in itself was not surprising to many seasoned Court watchers, the fact that it was handed down with a vote of 9-0 was not as expected.","format":"standard","video":"","gallery":"","source_name":"","source_url":"","via_name":"","via_url":"","override":[{"single_blog_custom":"","sidebar":"","second_sidebar":"","share_position":"","share_float_style":"","post_date_format":"","post_date_format_custom":"","post_reading_time_wpm":"","zoom_button_out_step":"1","zoom_button_in_step":"1","number_popup_post":"1"}],"image_override":[{"single_post_thumbnail_size":"","single_post_gallery_size":""}],"trending_post_position":"","trending_post_label":"","sponsored_post_label":"","sponsored_post_name":"","sponsored_post_url":"","sponsored_post_logo":"","sponsored_post_desc":""},"jnews_primary_category":{"id":"804"},"jnews_social_meta":[],"jnews_override_counter":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[804,510,805],"tags":[8867,827,3982,641,9622],"class_list":["post-78546","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-breaking-news","category-family","category-foreground","tag-first-amendment","tag-religious-freedom","tag-religious-liberty","tag-supreme-court","tag-us-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v25.9 (Yoast SEO v25.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SCOTUS unanimously upholds religious freedom for Catholic Social Services - IFN<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/scotus-unanimously-upholds-religious-freedom-for-catholic-social-services\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SCOTUS unanimously upholds religious freedom for Catholic Social Services\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Though the ruling in itself was not surprising to many seasoned Court watchers, the fact that it was handed down with a vote of 9-0 was a bit unexpected.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/scotus-unanimously-upholds-religious-freedom-for-catholic-social-services\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"IFN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iFamNews\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/fb.com\/JoeyG2001\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-06-17T16:59:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-06-17T17:29:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/scotus-2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Joseph Grabowski\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/ArthurInglewood\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@iFamNewsEN\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Joseph Grabowski\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SCOTUS unanimously upholds religious freedom for Catholic Social Services - IFN","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/scotus-unanimously-upholds-religious-freedom-for-catholic-social-services","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SCOTUS unanimously upholds religious freedom for Catholic Social Services","og_description":"Though the ruling in itself was not surprising to many seasoned Court watchers, the fact that it was handed down with a vote of 9-0 was a bit unexpected.","og_url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/scotus-unanimously-upholds-religious-freedom-for-catholic-social-services","og_site_name":"IFN","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iFamNews","article_author":"https:\/\/fb.com\/JoeyG2001","article_published_time":"2021-06-17T16:59:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-06-17T17:29:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/scotus-2.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Joseph Grabowski","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/ArthurInglewood","twitter_site":"@iFamNewsEN","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Joseph Grabowski","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/scotus-unanimously-upholds-religious-freedom-for-catholic-social-services#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/scotus-unanimously-upholds-religious-freedom-for-catholic-social-services"},"author":{"name":"Joseph Grabowski","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/30305f5661b96ab7ae4c4cabd3631ed4"},"headline":"SCOTUS unanimously upholds religious freedom for Catholic Social Services","datePublished":"2021-06-17T16:59:01+00:00","dateModified":"2021-06-17T17:29:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/scotus-unanimously-upholds-religious-freedom-for-catholic-social-services"},"wordCount":412,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/scotus-unanimously-upholds-religious-freedom-for-catholic-social-services#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/scotus-2.jpg","keywords":["first amendment","Religious Freedom","Religious Liberty","Supreme Court","US Supreme Court"],"articleSection":["Breaking News","Family","Foreground"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/scotus-unanimously-upholds-religious-freedom-for-catholic-social-services#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/scotus-unanimously-upholds-religious-freedom-for-catholic-social-services","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/scotus-unanimously-upholds-religious-freedom-for-catholic-social-services","name":"SCOTUS unanimously upholds religious freedom for Catholic Social Services - IFN","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/scotus-unanimously-upholds-religious-freedom-for-catholic-social-services#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/scotus-unanimously-upholds-religious-freedom-for-catholic-social-services#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/scotus-2.jpg","datePublished":"2021-06-17T16:59:01+00:00","dateModified":"2021-06-17T17:29:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/scotus-unanimously-upholds-religious-freedom-for-catholic-social-services#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/scotus-unanimously-upholds-religious-freedom-for-catholic-social-services"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/scotus-unanimously-upholds-religious-freedom-for-catholic-social-services#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/scotus-2.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/scotus-2.jpg","width":1200,"height":675},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/scotus-unanimously-upholds-religious-freedom-for-catholic-social-services#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Breaking News","item":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/category\/breaking-news"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"SCOTUS unanimously upholds religious freedom for Catholic Social Services"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/","name":"IFN","description":"International Family News Network","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#organization","name":"iFamNews","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/Share-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/Share-logo.png","width":200,"height":200,"caption":"iFamNews"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iFamNews","https:\/\/x.com\/iFamNewsEN"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/30305f5661b96ab7ae4c4cabd3631ed4","name":"Joseph Grabowski","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/da56cd73ef38f2251d2a2f26456356b62cf59dd9ce3c93148cd2267f6819255e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/da56cd73ef38f2251d2a2f26456356b62cf59dd9ce3c93148cd2267f6819255e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Joseph Grabowski"},"description":"Joseph Grabowski was the Executive Director of the International Organization for the Family until August 2022. He also served as Director of Communications for the National Organization for Marriage. Joseph has a B.A. in Philosophy from Saint Charles Borromeo Seminary, Overbrook and M.A. in English from Marquette University.\u00a0 Joe has appeared as an expert on traditional marriage and family in local and nationwide media, including\u00a0The New York Times,\u00a0The Washington Post,\u00a0The Boston Globe,\u00a0Breitbart, and elsewhere. Joe\u2019s writings on traditional marriage and family, as well as on Catholic Social Teaching and the writings of G. K. Chesterton and Hilaire Belloc, have appeared in\u00a0The Stream,\u00a0Gilbert\u00a0Magazine,\u00a0Ethika Politika, and\u00a0The Distributist Review, and he has spoken at several national conferences on the place of G.K. Chesterton in 20th Century literature and thought.","sameAs":["https:\/\/joegrabowski.com","https:\/\/fb.com\/JoeyG2001","https:\/\/linkedin.com\/in\/josephlgrabowski\/","https:\/\/x.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/ArthurInglewood"],"url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/author\/jgrabowski"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78546","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=78546"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78546\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":79221,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78546\/revisions\/79221"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/78559"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=78546"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=78546"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=78546"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}