{"id":31355,"date":"2020-10-08T09:18:30","date_gmt":"2020-10-08T14:18:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/?p=31355"},"modified":"2020-10-08T09:20:22","modified_gmt":"2020-10-08T14:20:22","slug":"u-s-supreme-court-justices-signal-willingness-to-reverse-ruling-imposing-gay-marriage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/u-s-supreme-court-justices-signal-willingness-to-reverse-ruling-imposing-gay-marriage","title":{"rendered":"U.S. Supreme Court Justices Signal Willingness to Reverse Ruling Imposing Gay \u2018Marriage\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

In a surprising and virtually unprecedented commentary issued on Monday, two US Supreme Court justices publicly signaled that they are willing to reverse the Court\u2019s narrow 5-4 ruling in 2015 imposing same-sex \u2018marriage\u2019 on the nation in the Obergefell v Hodges<\/em> case. In a procedural opinion issued this week in a different case, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for himself and Justice Samuel Alito that the \u201cright to same-sex marriage\u2026is found nowhere in the text [of the Constitution].\u201d He called it \u201can alteration to the Constitution\u201d and said that the decision whether or not to change the definition of marriage should be left up to the states.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The declaration sent shock waves throughout the homosexual community. A pro-gay writer at Slate<\/em> magazine minced no words about the importance of this development: \u201cIf Amy Coney Barrett is confirmed [same-sex marriage] is likely doomed.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The news was welcomed by pro-family groups such as the National Organization for Marriage (NOM). NOM\u2019s president, Brian Brown (who also is the publisher of ifamnews.com) said, \u201cFor many months, NOM has pointed out that we are approaching \u2013 if not already at \u2013 the point where the Supreme Court\u2019s illegitimate, anti-constitutional imposition of gay \u2018marriage\u2019 on the nation in the Obergefell<\/em> ruling could be reversed. Now two Supreme Court justices, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, have given voice to that very point. Make no mistake about it \u2013 the confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court is essential to our continuing efforts to overturn Obergefell <\/em>and restore marriage to our nation\u2019s laws.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It would be one thing if recognition for same-sex marriage had been debated and adopted through the democratic process\u2026it is quite another when the Court forces that choice upon society\u2026<\/p>Justice Clarence Thomas<\/cite><\/blockquote><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Here\u2019s what went down this past Monday: In a written explanation of their decision in a procedural ruling on a case, Justice Clarence Thomas took the highly unusual step of issuing a statement on behalf of himself and Justice Alito that by improperly reading a right to same-sex \u2018marriage\u2019 into the US Constitution, the Supreme Court \u201cthreaten[s] the religious liberty of the many Americans who believe that marriage is a sacred institution between one man and one woman.\u201d The Obergefell <\/em>decision, Justice Thomas wrote, casts people of faith as \u201cbigots,\u201d \u201cdemeaning to gays and lesbians,\u201d \u201cimposing stigma and injury\u201d and \u201cdisrespectful to gays and lesbians.\u201d But none of those things are true, he said. Instead, the issue of same-sex \u2018marriage\u2019 is one that properly belongs to the states, where policymakers could debate the matter including any accommodations they might wish to afford people of faith. That debate was short-circuited, Justice Thomas lamented, by the ill-advised, narrow 5-4 majority that decided Obergefell<\/em>, Justice Thomas said \u201cIt would be one thing if recognition for same-sex marriage had been debated and adopted through the democratic process\u2026[b]ut it is quite another when the Court forces that choice upon society through its creation of atextual constitutional rights and its ungenerous interpretation of the Free Exercise Clause, leaving those with religious objections in the lurch.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is highly unusual for Supreme Court justices to make any comments on a procedural ruling, let alone signal their desire to overturn a major decision such as Obergefell<\/em>. So where do pro-family advocates stand in terms of being able to secure a majority of votes on the Court to overturn the illegitimate, anti-constitutional Obergefell<\/em> ruling?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s always speculation to predict how a justice might vote on a future case, but here\u2019s how things line up to me:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It takes five votes to secure a majority on the Supreme Court. So we start with Thomas + Alito = 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fellow conservatives Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh both strongly believe that the Constitution should be interpreted as written and, thus, are thought to be reliable votes against the imposition of same-sex marriage. That results in Thomas + Alito + Gorsuch + Kavanaugh = 4.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chief Justice John Roberts strongly objected to the majority ruling in Obergefell, <\/em>but he can be fickle and certainly cannot be counted on to cast the deciding<\/em><\/strong> vote to reverse Obergefel<\/em>l. So, that leaves us still at 4 votes to reverse Obergefell<\/em>, with a question mark, among the current justices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This brings us to Judge Amy Coney Barrett who has a long record of personal support for traditional marriage and has been sharply critical of Supreme Court rulings that articulate so-called \u201crights\u201d that are found nowhere in the text of the Constitution. If past is prelude, then we have Thomas + Alito + Gorsuch + Kavanaugh + Barrett = 5. With Amy Coney Barrett on the Supreme Court, her deciding vote<\/em> to restore marriage could well be enough to persuade Chief Justice Roberts to stick with his original opinion and vote to overturn Obergefell as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Add this all together and you get a formula that, regardless of Justice Roberts\u2019 vote, would spell the end of court-imposed same-sex marriage, and return the issue to the states where over 50 million Americans have already cast ballots to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now, there are a lot of \u2018ifs\u2019 in this scenario and admittedly it involves a good deal of speculation. Still, it seems clear to me that the issue of the imposition of same-sex \u2018marriage\u2019 on this nation is now front and center once again, a development that makes the confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett all the more important for conservatives and pro-family advocates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On this, I am in complete agreement with pro-gay advocates and leftist publications like Slate <\/em>magazine.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Gay advocates say same-sex ‘marriage’ “is doomed” if Amy Coney Barrett s confirmed to the U.S. Supreme Court.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":35,"featured_media":31457,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"give_campaign_id":0,"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"mc4wp_mailchimp_campaign":[],"jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":{"subtitle":"","format":"standard","video":"","gallery":"","source_name":"","source_url":"","via_name":"","via_url":"","override":[{"single_blog_custom":"","sidebar":"","second_sidebar":"","share_position":"","share_float_style":"","post_date_format":"","post_date_format_custom":"","post_reading_time_wpm":"","zoom_button_out_step":"1","zoom_button_in_step":"1","number_popup_post":"1"}],"image_override":[{"single_post_thumbnail_size":"","single_post_gallery_size":""}],"trending_post_position":"","trending_post_label":"","sponsored_post_label":"","sponsored_post_name":"","sponsored_post_url":"","sponsored_post_logo":"","sponsored_post_desc":""},"jnews_primary_category":{"id":""},"jnews_social_meta":{"fb_title":"","fb_description":"","fb_image":"","twitter_title":"","twitter_description":"","twitter_image":""},"jnews_override_counter":{"view_counter_number":"0","share_counter_number":"0","like_counter_number":"0","dislike_counter_number":"0"},"footnotes":""},"categories":[804,805,512],"tags":[5858,5949,5952,1450,427,5950,5951,641],"class_list":["post-31355","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-breaking-news","category-foreground","category-politics","tag-amy-coney-barrett-2","tag-clarence-thomas","tag-homosexual","tag-lgbt-5","tag-marriage","tag-samuel-alito","tag-slate-magazine","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"\nU.S. Supreme Court Justices Signal Willingness to Reverse Ruling Imposing Gay \u2018Marriage\u2019 - IFN<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/u-s-supreme-court-justices-signal-willingness-to-reverse-ruling-imposing-gay-marriage\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"U.S. Supreme Court Justices Signal Willingness to Reverse Ruling Imposing Gay \u2018Marriage\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Gay advocates say same-sex 'marriage' "is doomed" if Amy Coney Barrett s confirmed to the U.S. Supreme Court.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/u-s-supreme-court-justices-signal-willingness-to-reverse-ruling-imposing-gay-marriage\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"IFN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iFamNews\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-10-08T14:18:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-10-08T14:20:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/lgbt-at-scotus-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1388\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Frank Schubert\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@iFamNewsEN\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@iFamNewsEN\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Frank Schubert\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"U.S. Supreme Court Justices Signal Willingness to Reverse Ruling Imposing Gay \u2018Marriage\u2019 - IFN","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/u-s-supreme-court-justices-signal-willingness-to-reverse-ruling-imposing-gay-marriage","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"U.S. Supreme Court Justices Signal Willingness to Reverse Ruling Imposing Gay \u2018Marriage\u2019","og_description":"Gay advocates say same-sex 'marriage' \"is doomed\" if Amy Coney Barrett s confirmed to the U.S. Supreme Court.","og_url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/u-s-supreme-court-justices-signal-willingness-to-reverse-ruling-imposing-gay-marriage","og_site_name":"IFN","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iFamNews","article_published_time":"2020-10-08T14:18:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-10-08T14:20:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1388,"url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/lgbt-at-scotus-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Frank Schubert","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@iFamNewsEN","twitter_site":"@iFamNewsEN","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Frank Schubert","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/u-s-supreme-court-justices-signal-willingness-to-reverse-ruling-imposing-gay-marriage#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/u-s-supreme-court-justices-signal-willingness-to-reverse-ruling-imposing-gay-marriage"},"author":{"name":"Frank Schubert","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/7f059c4599e9d9efee95adbaab98c714"},"headline":"U.S. Supreme Court Justices Signal Willingness to Reverse Ruling Imposing Gay \u2018Marriage\u2019","datePublished":"2020-10-08T14:18:30+00:00","dateModified":"2020-10-08T14:20:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/u-s-supreme-court-justices-signal-willingness-to-reverse-ruling-imposing-gay-marriage"},"wordCount":935,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/u-s-supreme-court-justices-signal-willingness-to-reverse-ruling-imposing-gay-marriage#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/lgbt-at-scotus-scaled.jpg","keywords":["Amy Coney Barrett","Clarence Thomas","homosexual","lgbt","Marriage","Samuel Alito","Slate Magazine","Supreme Court"],"articleSection":["Breaking News","Foreground","Politics"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/u-s-supreme-court-justices-signal-willingness-to-reverse-ruling-imposing-gay-marriage#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/u-s-supreme-court-justices-signal-willingness-to-reverse-ruling-imposing-gay-marriage","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/u-s-supreme-court-justices-signal-willingness-to-reverse-ruling-imposing-gay-marriage","name":"U.S. Supreme Court Justices Signal Willingness to Reverse Ruling Imposing Gay \u2018Marriage\u2019 - IFN","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/u-s-supreme-court-justices-signal-willingness-to-reverse-ruling-imposing-gay-marriage#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/u-s-supreme-court-justices-signal-willingness-to-reverse-ruling-imposing-gay-marriage#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/lgbt-at-scotus-scaled.jpg","datePublished":"2020-10-08T14:18:30+00:00","dateModified":"2020-10-08T14:20:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/u-s-supreme-court-justices-signal-willingness-to-reverse-ruling-imposing-gay-marriage#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/u-s-supreme-court-justices-signal-willingness-to-reverse-ruling-imposing-gay-marriage"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/u-s-supreme-court-justices-signal-willingness-to-reverse-ruling-imposing-gay-marriage#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/lgbt-at-scotus-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/lgbt-at-scotus-scaled.jpg","width":2560,"height":1388,"caption":"FILE - In this April 28, 2015 file photo, demonstrators stand in front of a rainbow flag of the Supreme Court in Washington as the Supreme Court was set to hear historic arguments in cases that could make same-sex marriage. (AP Photo\/Jose Luis Magana, File)"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/u-s-supreme-court-justices-signal-willingness-to-reverse-ruling-imposing-gay-marriage#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Breaking News","item":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/category\/breaking-news"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"U.S. Supreme Court Justices Signal Willingness to Reverse Ruling Imposing Gay \u2018Marriage\u2019"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/","name":"IFN","description":"International Family News Network","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#organization","name":"iFamNews","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/Share-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/Share-logo.png","width":200,"height":200,"caption":"iFamNews"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iFamNews","https:\/\/x.com\/iFamNewsEN"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/7f059c4599e9d9efee95adbaab98c714","name":"Frank Schubert","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8e0a875546e6ef79d48161a997753eefc2376ae6843657e3a11827a2b2886fd2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8e0a875546e6ef79d48161a997753eefc2376ae6843657e3a11827a2b2886fd2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8e0a875546e6ef79d48161a997753eefc2376ae6843657e3a11827a2b2886fd2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Frank Schubert"},"description":"Frank Schubert is a communications consultant for the International Organization for the Family (IOF) and has twice been named America\u2019s top public affairs professional. Schubert serves a similar role for the National Organization for Marriage (NOM). He has worked extensively on family-related issues including supporting marriage, the sanctity of human life and religious liberty, among other issues. Schubert is one of the country\u2019s top experts in managing ballot initiative campaigns and has won over 50 such campaigns in over one-dozen states, compiling an 80% winning record. He managed the successful Proposition 8 campaign in California as well as subsequent winning campaigns on marriage in Maine and North Carolina. His views on issues have been widely reported by the national and international media and he has been interviewed by news organizations hundreds of times. He is the founder of Inspiration Strategies, a public affairs firm.","url":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/author\/fschubertifamnews-com"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31355","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/35"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31355"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31355\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31465,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31355\/revisions\/31465"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/31457"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31355"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31355"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ifamnews.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31355"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}